| Project Name | WT |
| Project Name | WT |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 197.4 | 123.7 | 96.3 | 66.5 | 63.6 | 58.9 | 45.6 | 42.4 | 42.4 | 38.1 | 31.6 | 20.0 |
| Cluster size | 408 | 207 | 261 | 163 | 173 | 173 | 165 | 130 | 106 | 80 | 63 | 71 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 3.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.49 | 7.92 | 4.42 | 6.66 | 5.95 | 5.64 | 6.26 | 4.68 | 7.70 | 6.67 | 9.53 | 6.11 |
| GDT_TS | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 6.87 | 2.09 | 5.95 | 3.78 | 3.19 | 5.26 | 2.16 | 6.87 | 6.79 | 8.73 | 6.05 |
| 2 | 6.87 | 0.00 | 5.95 | 2.78 | 4.80 | 5.55 | 5.26 | 5.73 | 4.04 | 5.63 | 5.20 | 4.78 |
| 3 | 2.09 | 5.95 | 0.00 | 5.08 | 3.00 | 2.74 | 5.12 | 2.53 | 6.06 | 6.40 | 7.85 | 5.48 |
| 4 | 5.95 | 2.78 | 5.08 | 0.00 | 4.75 | 5.41 | 5.01 | 4.90 | 4.70 | 5.04 | 6.54 | 3.91 |
| 5 | 3.78 | 4.80 | 3.00 | 4.75 | 0.00 | 1.63 | 5.04 | 3.32 | 5.62 | 6.19 | 6.94 | 5.66 |
| 6 | 3.19 | 5.55 | 2.74 | 5.41 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 4.65 | 3.20 | 5.74 | 6.01 | 7.06 | 5.71 |
| 7 | 5.26 | 5.26 | 5.12 | 5.01 | 5.04 | 4.65 | 0.00 | 5.22 | 3.31 | 3.35 | 5.23 | 3.49 |
| 8 | 2.16 | 5.73 | 2.53 | 4.90 | 3.32 | 3.20 | 5.22 | 0.00 | 6.21 | 6.65 | 8.07 | 5.67 |
| 9 | 6.87 | 4.04 | 6.06 | 4.70 | 5.62 | 5.74 | 3.31 | 6.21 | 0.00 | 4.46 | 2.88 | 4.28 |
| 10 | 6.79 | 5.63 | 6.40 | 5.04 | 6.19 | 6.01 | 3.35 | 6.65 | 4.46 | 0.00 | 5.81 | 2.19 |
| 11 | 8.73 | 5.20 | 7.85 | 6.54 | 6.94 | 7.06 | 5.23 | 8.07 | 2.88 | 5.81 | 0.00 | 5.97 |
| 12 | 6.05 | 4.78 | 5.48 | 3.91 | 5.66 | 5.71 | 3.49 | 5.67 | 4.28 | 2.19 | 5.97 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.77 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.61 |
| 3 | 0.85 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.65 |
| 4 | 0.55 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.60 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.59 |
| 6 | 0.82 | 0.50 | 0.79 | 0.57 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.60 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.83 | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.62 |
| 9 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.62 |
| 10 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.83 |
| 11 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.85 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.55 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.83 | 0.55 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013