| Project Name | Jess_T45A |
| Project Name | Jess_T45A |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 406.0 | 359.9 | 211.2 | 209.7 | 121.8 | 111.9 | 105.4 | 72.0 | 59.4 | 49.8 | 35.3 | 34.8 |
| Cluster size | 361 | 375 | 265 | 222 | 154 | 115 | 100 | 117 | 112 | 84 | 51 | 44 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.35 | 5.63 | 1.70 | 5.89 | 4.90 | 1.68 | 5.15 | 4.50 | 3.74 | 3.94 | 5.17 | 5.84 |
| GDT_TS | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 4.41 | 1.07 | 0.84 | 4.60 | 3.52 | 1.84 | 2.69 | 2.28 | 4.64 | 4.21 |
| 2 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 4.67 | 0.73 | 1.45 | 4.88 | 3.61 | 2.24 | 2.97 | 2.79 | 4.73 | 4.22 |
| 3 | 4.41 | 4.67 | 0.00 | 4.85 | 3.97 | 0.49 | 4.41 | 3.70 | 2.88 | 3.19 | 4.46 | 5.14 |
| 4 | 1.07 | 0.73 | 4.85 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 5.04 | 3.63 | 2.42 | 3.10 | 2.88 | 4.62 | 4.09 |
| 5 | 0.84 | 1.45 | 3.97 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 4.16 | 3.49 | 1.61 | 2.36 | 1.89 | 4.48 | 4.27 |
| 6 | 4.60 | 4.88 | 0.49 | 5.04 | 4.16 | 0.00 | 4.48 | 3.86 | 2.96 | 3.30 | 4.42 | 5.18 |
| 7 | 3.52 | 3.61 | 4.41 | 3.63 | 3.49 | 4.48 | 0.00 | 3.75 | 4.01 | 3.81 | 3.10 | 2.82 |
| 8 | 1.84 | 2.24 | 3.70 | 2.42 | 1.61 | 3.86 | 3.75 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 1.61 | 4.55 | 4.54 |
| 9 | 2.69 | 2.97 | 2.88 | 3.10 | 2.36 | 2.96 | 4.01 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.82 | 4.56 | 4.80 |
| 10 | 2.28 | 2.79 | 3.19 | 2.88 | 1.89 | 3.30 | 3.81 | 1.61 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 4.14 | 4.50 |
| 11 | 4.64 | 4.73 | 4.46 | 4.62 | 4.48 | 4.42 | 3.10 | 4.55 | 4.56 | 4.14 | 0.00 | 2.31 |
| 12 | 4.21 | 4.22 | 5.14 | 4.09 | 4.27 | 5.18 | 2.82 | 4.54 | 4.80 | 4.50 | 2.31 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| 3 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
| 5 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| 7 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.79 |
| 8 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| 9 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| 11 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.87 |
| 12 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013