| Project Name | 1918WT |
| Project Name | 1918WT |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 196.8 | 186.5 | 170.5 | 164.3 | 127.9 | 125.8 | 116.2 | 104.1 | 103.8 | 89.7 | 81.4 | 63.4 |
| Cluster size | 256 | 231 | 216 | 208 | 182 | 162 | 165 | 151 | 137 | 115 | 108 | 69 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.30 | 2.32 | 1.94 | 2.50 | 2.51 | 2.54 | 1.82 | 2.43 | 1.51 | 2.61 | 2.47 | 2.61 |
| GDT_TS | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 1.58 | 1.65 | 2.01 | 1.42 | 2.18 | 2.46 | 2.25 | 1.26 | 2.62 | 3.13 |
| 2 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 2.43 | 1.47 | 2.67 | 1.68 | 1.38 | 2.51 | 2.56 | 0.95 | 1.43 |
| 3 | 1.58 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 1.86 | 2.21 | 1.40 | 1.55 | 1.97 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 2.39 |
| 4 | 1.65 | 2.43 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 1.22 | 2.36 | 2.44 | 2.65 | 1.49 | 2.70 | 3.01 |
| 5 | 2.01 | 1.47 | 1.86 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 1.96 | 1.70 | 2.75 | 2.10 | 1.61 | 1.94 |
| 6 | 1.42 | 2.67 | 2.21 | 1.22 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 2.72 | 2.56 | 1.33 | 2.90 | 3.27 |
| 7 | 2.18 | 1.68 | 1.40 | 2.36 | 1.96 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 1.46 | 1.88 | 2.30 | 1.72 | 1.90 |
| 8 | 2.46 | 1.38 | 1.55 | 2.44 | 1.70 | 2.72 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 2.59 | 1.43 | 1.85 |
| 9 | 2.25 | 2.51 | 1.97 | 2.65 | 2.75 | 2.56 | 1.88 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 2.66 | 2.73 |
| 10 | 1.26 | 2.56 | 1.92 | 1.49 | 2.10 | 1.33 | 2.30 | 2.59 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 2.74 | 3.20 |
| 11 | 2.62 | 0.95 | 1.92 | 2.70 | 1.61 | 2.90 | 1.72 | 1.43 | 2.66 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| 12 | 3.13 | 1.43 | 2.39 | 3.01 | 1.94 | 3.27 | 1.90 | 1.85 | 2.73 | 3.20 | 1.50 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.95 | 0.84 |
| 3 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.73 |
| 4 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| 5 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.79 |
| 6 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.71 | 0.75 |
| 7 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
| 8 | 0.73 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.81 |
| 9 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| 10 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| 11 | 0.71 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.83 |
| 12 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013