| Project Name | mc-11-12 |
| Project Name | mc-11-12 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 220.7 | 176.5 | 156.3 | 149.6 | 139.5 | 137.2 | 117.6 | 114.5 | 105.2 | 97.8 | 66.5 | 58.4 |
| Cluster size | 302 | 228 | 202 | 197 | 168 | 191 | 150 | 150 | 136 | 127 | 74 | 75 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.49 | 2.64 | 2.60 | 2.59 | 2.48 | 2.71 | 2.71 | 2.51 | 2.77 | 2.64 | 2.45 | 2.44 |
| GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 2.39 | 2.44 | 2.33 | 2.31 | 2.08 | 2.45 | 2.34 | 2.37 | 2.42 | 2.30 |
| 2 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.86 | 2.46 | 1.89 | 2.31 | 2.85 | 2.23 | 2.22 | 2.56 | 2.77 |
| 3 | 2.39 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 1.85 | 2.35 | 2.64 | 2.12 | 2.69 | 2.19 | 2.18 | 2.67 |
| 4 | 2.44 | 2.86 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.85 | 2.77 | 1.88 | 3.28 | 2.74 | 2.54 | 2.61 |
| 5 | 2.33 | 2.46 | 1.85 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 2.48 | 2.00 | 2.72 | 2.23 | 2.05 | 2.70 |
| 6 | 2.31 | 1.89 | 2.35 | 2.85 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.75 | 2.26 | 2.11 | 2.39 | 2.70 |
| 7 | 2.08 | 2.31 | 2.64 | 2.77 | 2.48 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 2.33 | 2.36 | 2.51 | 2.72 |
| 8 | 2.45 | 2.85 | 2.12 | 1.88 | 2.00 | 2.75 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 2.57 | 2.11 | 2.55 |
| 9 | 2.34 | 2.23 | 2.69 | 3.28 | 2.72 | 2.26 | 2.33 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 2.79 | 2.95 |
| 10 | 2.37 | 2.22 | 2.19 | 2.74 | 2.23 | 2.11 | 2.36 | 2.57 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.98 |
| 11 | 2.42 | 2.56 | 2.18 | 2.54 | 2.05 | 2.39 | 2.51 | 2.11 | 2.79 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.73 |
| 12 | 2.30 | 2.77 | 2.67 | 2.61 | 2.70 | 2.70 | 2.72 | 2.55 | 2.95 | 2.98 | 2.73 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| 3 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.66 |
| 4 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
| 5 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.66 |
| 8 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| 9 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.65 |
| 11 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 12 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013