| Project Name | Tetherin4c |
| Project Name | Tetherin4c |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 215.3 | 167.0 | 134.7 | 108.6 | 104.5 | 98.4 | 77.2 | 70.3 | 69.3 | 45.9 | 30.1 | 28.0 |
| Cluster size | 336 | 242 | 282 | 164 | 156 | 197 | 166 | 119 | 112 | 96 | 72 | 58 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.10 | 6.17 | 4.91 | 7.18 | 5.99 | 5.35 | 4.86 | 4.67 | 5.59 | 5.09 | 3.33 | 1.87 |
| GDT_TS | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.86 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.42 | 2.54 | 2.02 | 3.02 | 1.17 | 2.45 | 2.50 | 1.76 | 1.74 | 3.88 | 5.75 |
| 2 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 2.01 | 3.85 | 1.98 | 3.32 | 2.59 | 1.73 | 2.07 | 3.64 | 5.65 |
| 3 | 2.54 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 2.17 | 2.26 | 0.68 | 3.35 | 2.98 | 2.41 | 3.92 | 5.01 |
| 4 | 2.02 | 2.01 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 3.32 | 2.76 | 3.56 | 3.65 | 2.45 | 2.76 | 4.95 | 6.74 |
| 5 | 3.02 | 3.85 | 2.17 | 3.32 | 0.00 | 3.03 | 2.40 | 3.77 | 3.24 | 3.29 | 5.02 | 5.90 |
| 6 | 1.17 | 1.98 | 2.26 | 2.76 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 2.00 | 1.70 | 1.59 | 3.36 | 5.17 |
| 7 | 2.45 | 3.32 | 0.68 | 3.56 | 2.40 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 2.94 | 2.24 | 3.80 | 4.92 |
| 8 | 2.50 | 2.59 | 3.35 | 3.65 | 3.77 | 2.00 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 2.45 | 2.90 | 4.45 |
| 9 | 1.76 | 1.73 | 2.98 | 2.45 | 3.24 | 1.70 | 2.94 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 3.68 | 5.54 |
| 10 | 1.74 | 2.07 | 2.41 | 2.76 | 3.29 | 1.59 | 2.24 | 2.45 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 4.93 |
| 11 | 3.88 | 3.64 | 3.92 | 4.95 | 5.02 | 3.36 | 3.80 | 2.90 | 3.68 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.97 |
| 12 | 5.75 | 5.65 | 5.01 | 6.74 | 5.90 | 5.17 | 4.92 | 4.45 | 5.54 | 4.93 | 2.97 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.79 |
| 4 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.75 |
| 7 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.80 |
| 8 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.75 |
| 9 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| 10 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.78 |
| 11 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013