Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 183.8 | 169.6 | 161.7 | 155.8 | 139.3 | 136.3 | 126.1 | 118.1 | 101.3 | 94.7 | 83.4 | 83.3 |
Cluster size | 238 | 214 | 201 | 205 | 168 | 167 | 164 | 151 | 124 | 116 | 112 | 140 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.66 | 2.98 | 2.69 | 2.71 | 2.58 | 2.86 | 2.84 | 2.75 | 2.69 | 2.74 | 3.05 | 2.52 |
GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 1.97 | 2.23 | 2.29 | 2.41 | 2.43 | 2.17 | 2.45 | 2.39 | 2.84 | 1.67 |
2 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 2.95 | 3.06 | 2.05 | 2.14 | 2.18 | 3.02 | 2.42 | 2.68 | 2.68 |
3 | 1.97 | 2.85 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.45 | 2.71 | 2.75 | 2.60 | 2.39 | 2.70 | 3.14 | 1.94 |
4 | 2.23 | 2.95 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 2.61 | 2.76 | 2.33 | 2.47 | 2.64 | 2.94 | 2.29 |
5 | 2.29 | 3.06 | 2.45 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 2.78 | 2.48 | 2.21 | 2.58 | 2.89 | 2.32 |
6 | 2.41 | 2.05 | 2.71 | 2.61 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.23 | 3.02 | 2.47 | 2.92 | 2.54 |
7 | 2.43 | 2.14 | 2.75 | 2.76 | 2.78 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.77 | 1.88 | 2.41 | 2.44 |
8 | 2.17 | 2.18 | 2.60 | 2.33 | 2.48 | 2.23 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 2.44 | 2.90 | 2.39 |
9 | 2.45 | 3.02 | 2.39 | 2.47 | 2.21 | 3.02 | 2.77 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 3.02 | 2.36 |
10 | 2.39 | 2.42 | 2.70 | 2.64 | 2.58 | 2.47 | 1.88 | 2.44 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.40 |
11 | 2.84 | 2.68 | 3.14 | 2.94 | 2.89 | 2.92 | 2.41 | 2.90 | 3.02 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.87 |
12 | 1.67 | 2.68 | 1.94 | 2.29 | 2.32 | 2.54 | 2.44 | 2.39 | 2.36 | 2.40 | 2.87 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.82 |
2 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
3 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.79 |
4 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.71 |
5 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.72 |
6 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
7 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.72 |
9 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.72 |
10 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
11 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
12 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013