| Project Name | AP |
| Project Name | AP |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 232.1 | 231.9 | 185.0 | 184.7 | 159.9 | 152.6 | 143.7 | 132.0 | 125.6 | 85.3 | 79.4 | 69.3 |
| Cluster size | 280 | 245 | 204 | 217 | 197 | 153 | 148 | 176 | 133 | 92 | 86 | 69 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.05 | 5.07 | 4.60 | 5.78 | 3.63 | 5.28 | 5.43 | 3.72 | 3.80 | 3.43 | 3.14 | 3.99 |
| GDT_TS | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 2.72 | 3.83 | 2.54 | 3.66 | 3.76 | 2.73 | 2.49 | 3.56 | 3.50 | 2.72 |
| 2 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.45 | 3.42 | 2.57 | 2.69 | 3.31 | 3.13 | 4.55 | 4.53 | 2.96 |
| 3 | 2.72 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 3.21 | 2.86 | 3.01 | 2.96 | 3.07 | 4.06 | 4.11 | 2.85 |
| 4 | 3.83 | 2.45 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 3.89 | 2.51 | 2.72 | 3.60 | 3.65 | 4.93 | 5.32 | 3.66 |
| 5 | 2.54 | 3.42 | 3.21 | 3.89 | 0.00 | 4.07 | 4.11 | 2.12 | 2.40 | 3.38 | 3.40 | 2.99 |
| 6 | 3.66 | 2.57 | 2.86 | 2.51 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 3.51 | 3.45 | 4.78 | 4.84 | 3.41 |
| 7 | 3.76 | 2.69 | 3.01 | 2.72 | 4.11 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 3.63 | 3.58 | 5.02 | 4.95 | 3.55 |
| 8 | 2.73 | 3.31 | 2.96 | 3.60 | 2.12 | 3.51 | 3.63 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 3.14 | 3.37 | 2.67 |
| 9 | 2.49 | 3.13 | 3.07 | 3.65 | 2.40 | 3.45 | 3.58 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 3.07 | 2.41 |
| 10 | 3.56 | 4.55 | 4.06 | 4.93 | 3.38 | 4.78 | 5.02 | 3.14 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 3.53 |
| 11 | 3.50 | 4.53 | 4.11 | 5.32 | 3.40 | 4.84 | 4.95 | 3.37 | 3.07 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 3.29 |
| 12 | 2.72 | 2.96 | 2.85 | 3.66 | 2.99 | 3.41 | 3.55 | 2.67 | 2.41 | 3.53 | 3.29 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
| 2 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.61 |
| 3 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.62 |
| 4 | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.58 |
| 5 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.62 |
| 6 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.57 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.52 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.64 |
| 9 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| 10 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| 11 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| 12 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013