| Project Name | CHEM361HET3,3 |
| Project Name | CHEM361HET3,3 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 427.9 | 421.5 | 366.9 | 348.5 | 332.8 | 287.7 | 228.0 | 186.9 | 166.7 | 164.4 | 135.1 | 86.2 |
| Cluster size | 245 | 248 | 242 | 217 | 204 | 199 | 157 | 118 | 120 | 105 | 84 | 61 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.39 | 1.33 | 1.35 | 1.31 | 1.32 | 1.37 | 1.72 | 1.14 | 1.37 | 2.28 | 2.08 | 2.31 |
| GDT_TS | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.85 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.67 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 1.66 | 1.54 | 1.68 |
| 2 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 1.65 | 1.60 | 1.65 |
| 3 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.59 | 0.39 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 1.66 | 1.58 | 1.63 |
| 4 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.34 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 1.70 | 1.61 | 1.67 |
| 5 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 1.66 | 1.50 | 1.73 |
| 6 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 1.69 | 1.68 | 1.62 |
| 7 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.80 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 1.78 | 1.73 | 1.66 |
| 8 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 1.72 | 1.60 | 1.73 |
| 9 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.54 | 1.56 | 1.63 |
| 10 | 1.66 | 1.65 | 1.66 | 1.70 | 1.66 | 1.69 | 1.78 | 1.72 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 0.75 |
| 11 | 1.54 | 1.60 | 1.58 | 1.61 | 1.50 | 1.68 | 1.73 | 1.60 | 1.56 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 2.33 |
| 12 | 1.68 | 1.65 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 1.73 | 1.62 | 1.66 | 1.73 | 1.63 | 0.75 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.93 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| 5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.93 |
| 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| 7 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.95 |
| 8 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 |
| 9 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 |
| 10 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| 11 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.92 |
| 12 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013