| Project Name | ECA52V |
| Project Name | ECA52V |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 173.1 | 170.5 | 156.1 | 146.6 | 115.8 | 108.9 | 105.9 | 102.2 | 87.5 | 78.3 | 73.7 | 48.2 |
| Cluster size | 215 | 270 | 224 | 212 | 204 | 114 | 142 | 164 | 153 | 112 | 88 | 102 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.85 | 5.06 | 4.10 | 7.11 | 7.50 | 7.18 | 5.37 | 6.07 | 6.12 | 8.13 | 5.89 | 5.23 |
| GDT_TS | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.48 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 5.24 | 5.52 | 2.61 | 2.09 | 2.38 | 4.39 | 2.54 | 3.60 | 3.26 | 4.53 | 5.17 |
| 2 | 5.24 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 4.05 | 3.86 | 4.40 | 1.64 | 3.31 | 3.02 | 4.05 | 3.61 | 1.66 |
| 3 | 5.52 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 4.97 | 4.57 | 4.87 | 1.85 | 3.35 | 2.92 | 5.21 | 3.37 | 2.02 |
| 4 | 2.61 | 4.05 | 4.97 | 0.00 | 2.01 | 2.25 | 3.77 | 3.13 | 3.28 | 2.35 | 4.65 | 4.37 |
| 5 | 2.09 | 3.86 | 4.57 | 2.01 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 3.23 | 1.86 | 2.88 | 2.19 | 4.03 | 3.87 |
| 6 | 2.38 | 4.40 | 4.87 | 2.25 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 4.02 | 2.77 | 3.11 | 3.38 | 4.38 | 4.53 |
| 7 | 4.39 | 1.64 | 1.85 | 3.77 | 3.23 | 4.02 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.09 | 3.76 | 3.07 | 1.95 |
| 8 | 2.54 | 3.31 | 3.35 | 3.13 | 1.86 | 2.77 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 3.32 | 3.40 | 3.20 |
| 9 | 3.60 | 3.02 | 2.92 | 3.28 | 2.88 | 3.11 | 2.09 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 2.45 | 2.91 |
| 10 | 3.26 | 4.05 | 5.21 | 2.35 | 2.19 | 3.38 | 3.76 | 3.32 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 4.68 | 4.33 |
| 11 | 4.53 | 3.61 | 3.37 | 4.65 | 4.03 | 4.38 | 3.07 | 3.40 | 2.45 | 4.68 | 0.00 | 3.23 |
| 12 | 5.17 | 1.66 | 2.02 | 4.37 | 3.87 | 4.53 | 1.95 | 3.20 | 2.91 | 4.33 | 3.23 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.62 |
| 2 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.91 |
| 3 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.69 | 0.80 |
| 4 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.63 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 0.69 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.59 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.79 |
| 8 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.65 |
| 10 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.55 |
| 11 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.65 |
| 12 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013