| Project Name | reza |
| Project Name | reza |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 69.0 | 64.5 | 63.7 | 61.8 | 60.8 | 57.9 | 56.2 | 53.1 | 51.8 | 35.8 | 33.9 | 29.4 |
| Cluster size | 221 | 193 | 225 | 191 | 166 | 195 | 163 | 185 | 150 | 112 | 118 | 81 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 2.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.96 | 6.95 | 6.46 | 6.77 | 5.53 | 7.29 | 6.41 | 5.74 | 7.55 | 5.07 | 4.26 | 6.16 |
| GDT_TS | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.40 | 4.84 | 3.26 | 5.34 | 5.11 | 5.37 | 3.92 | 4.51 | 8.15 | 8.57 | 8.24 |
| 2 | 3.40 | 0.00 | 4.41 | 4.29 | 5.95 | 5.18 | 5.48 | 3.72 | 4.35 | 7.59 | 7.93 | 7.91 |
| 3 | 4.84 | 4.41 | 0.00 | 3.74 | 5.28 | 2.63 | 4.25 | 2.38 | 7.31 | 5.27 | 6.90 | 5.08 |
| 4 | 3.26 | 4.29 | 3.74 | 0.00 | 4.39 | 4.22 | 4.27 | 3.28 | 5.80 | 7.09 | 8.21 | 6.98 |
| 5 | 5.34 | 5.95 | 5.28 | 4.39 | 0.00 | 5.64 | 3.00 | 5.04 | 6.17 | 6.27 | 6.81 | 6.04 |
| 6 | 5.11 | 5.18 | 2.63 | 4.22 | 5.64 | 0.00 | 4.62 | 3.48 | 8.12 | 5.85 | 7.48 | 5.37 |
| 7 | 5.37 | 5.48 | 4.25 | 4.27 | 3.00 | 4.62 | 0.00 | 4.75 | 6.69 | 5.92 | 7.09 | 5.14 |
| 8 | 3.92 | 3.72 | 2.38 | 3.28 | 5.04 | 3.48 | 4.75 | 0.00 | 6.38 | 5.75 | 6.86 | 5.84 |
| 9 | 4.51 | 4.35 | 7.31 | 5.80 | 6.17 | 8.12 | 6.69 | 6.38 | 0.00 | 9.41 | 8.99 | 10.10 |
| 10 | 8.15 | 7.59 | 5.27 | 7.09 | 6.27 | 5.85 | 5.92 | 5.75 | 9.41 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.55 |
| 11 | 8.57 | 7.93 | 6.90 | 8.21 | 6.81 | 7.48 | 7.09 | 6.86 | 8.99 | 3.80 | 0.00 | 5.56 |
| 12 | 8.24 | 7.91 | 5.08 | 6.98 | 6.04 | 5.37 | 5.14 | 5.84 | 10.10 | 3.55 | 5.56 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.57 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
| 3 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.86 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.60 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.55 |
| 5 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.68 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
| 9 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| 11 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 12 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013