| Project Name | 6 |
| Project Name | 6 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 375.9 | 192.1 | 191.3 | 139.0 | 107.9 | 74.8 | 44.4 | 41.8 | 35.4 | 33.0 | 30.0 | 22.8 |
| Cluster size | 449 | 257 | 300 | 220 | 192 | 143 | 100 | 104 | 62 | 64 | 68 | 41 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.48 | 3.06 | 2.39 | 2.59 | 2.50 | 2.63 | 3.17 | 3.82 | 2.30 | 2.07 | 2.24 | 3.53 |
| GDT_TS | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.75 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.14 | 0.92 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.76 | 2.02 | 2.55 | 1.74 | 1.49 | 3.07 | 4.51 |
| 2 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.24 | 2.70 | 2.25 | 2.42 | 1.99 | 3.48 | 4.66 |
| 3 | 0.92 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.02 | 1.12 | 1.08 | 1.94 | 2.90 | 1.53 | 1.49 | 2.62 | 3.98 |
| 4 | 0.59 | 1.08 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.58 | 2.30 | 2.61 | 1.65 | 1.43 | 3.18 | 4.63 |
| 5 | 0.52 | 1.08 | 1.12 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 2.11 | 2.54 | 1.97 | 1.60 | 3.06 | 4.53 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 1.24 | 1.08 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.72 | 1.56 | 1.40 | 3.21 | 4.58 |
| 7 | 2.02 | 2.70 | 1.94 | 2.30 | 2.11 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 2.48 | 2.75 | 3.11 | 4.20 |
| 8 | 2.55 | 2.25 | 2.90 | 2.61 | 2.54 | 2.72 | 2.99 | 0.00 | 3.30 | 2.67 | 3.51 | 3.87 |
| 9 | 1.74 | 2.42 | 1.53 | 1.65 | 1.97 | 1.56 | 2.48 | 3.30 | 0.00 | 1.46 | 2.98 | 4.28 |
| 10 | 1.49 | 1.99 | 1.49 | 1.43 | 1.60 | 1.40 | 2.75 | 2.67 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 3.98 |
| 11 | 3.07 | 3.48 | 2.62 | 3.18 | 3.06 | 3.21 | 3.11 | 3.51 | 2.98 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| 12 | 4.51 | 4.66 | 3.98 | 4.63 | 4.53 | 4.58 | 4.20 | 3.87 | 4.28 | 3.98 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.80 |
| 3 | 0.94 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.89 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.84 |
| 5 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.82 |
| 6 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.86 |
| 7 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
| 8 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.84 |
| 9 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.85 |
| 10 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.84 |
| 11 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.89 |
| 12 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013