| Project Name | 12 |
| Project Name | 12 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 292.7 | 232.1 | 208.6 | 172.8 | 169.0 | 141.4 | 124.3 | 114.6 | 87.8 | 69.2 | 54.9 | 39.9 |
| Cluster size | 285 | 295 | 236 | 180 | 167 | 195 | 167 | 147 | 128 | 121 | 47 | 32 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.09 | 2.08 | 2.22 | 3.04 | 3.13 | 3.32 | 3.58 | 2.69 | 3.88 | 3.02 | 2.74 | 3.21 |
| GDT_TS | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 3.65 | 1.89 | 1.51 | 2.92 | 2.08 | 1.67 | 4.02 | 2.87 | 1.94 | 1.82 |
| 2 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 1.54 | 2.35 | 2.65 | 2.79 | 2.87 | 2.20 | 3.12 | 2.28 | 2.04 | 2.93 |
| 3 | 3.65 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 3.23 | 2.56 | 3.40 | 2.86 | 2.63 | 2.26 | 3.14 | 3.72 |
| 4 | 1.89 | 2.35 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 1.19 | 1.36 | 1.17 | 1.39 | 2.44 | 1.39 | 2.50 | 2.23 |
| 5 | 1.51 | 2.65 | 3.23 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 1.07 | 1.29 | 3.08 | 1.94 | 2.25 | 1.56 |
| 6 | 2.92 | 2.79 | 2.56 | 1.36 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 2.26 | 1.66 | 1.27 | 3.45 | 3.06 |
| 7 | 2.08 | 2.87 | 3.40 | 1.17 | 1.07 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 1.66 | 2.73 | 1.74 | 2.67 | 2.07 |
| 8 | 1.67 | 2.20 | 2.86 | 1.39 | 1.29 | 2.26 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 3.21 | 1.84 | 1.87 | 1.96 |
| 9 | 4.02 | 3.12 | 2.63 | 2.44 | 3.08 | 1.66 | 2.73 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 4.18 | 3.89 |
| 10 | 2.87 | 2.28 | 2.26 | 1.39 | 1.94 | 1.27 | 1.74 | 1.84 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 3.05 | 2.97 |
| 11 | 1.94 | 2.04 | 3.14 | 2.50 | 2.25 | 3.45 | 2.67 | 1.87 | 4.18 | 3.05 | 0.00 | 2.09 |
| 12 | 1.82 | 2.93 | 3.72 | 2.23 | 1.56 | 3.06 | 2.07 | 1.96 | 3.89 | 2.97 | 2.09 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.77 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.83 |
| 5 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.92 |
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.82 |
| 7 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.85 |
| 8 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.81 |
| 9 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| 11 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| 12 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013