Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 231.4 | 206.7 | 157.5 | 151.8 | 144.7 | 142.3 | 122.2 | 119.2 | 96.6 | 96.1 | 81.3 | 66.5 |
Cluster size | 284 | 263 | 206 | 174 | 162 | 174 | 167 | 139 | 131 | 118 | 100 | 82 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.60 | 2.73 | 2.72 | 2.49 | 2.55 | 2.60 | 2.50 | 2.73 | 2.51 | 2.49 | 2.38 | 2.51 |
GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.11 | 2.11 | 2.02 | 1.97 | 2.30 | 1.91 | 2.10 | 2.40 | 1.95 | 2.20 |
2 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 2.27 | 2.07 | 2.11 | 2.20 | 1.78 | 2.04 | 2.27 | 2.22 | 2.17 |
3 | 2.11 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.33 | 2.38 | 2.68 | 2.07 | 2.26 | 2.35 | 2.20 | 2.39 |
4 | 2.11 | 2.27 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 1.59 | 2.34 | 2.22 | 1.96 | 2.14 | 1.95 | 1.69 |
5 | 2.02 | 2.07 | 2.33 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.84 | 2.35 | 2.22 | 2.23 | 1.77 | 1.79 | 1.95 |
6 | 1.97 | 2.11 | 2.38 | 1.59 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 2.04 | 2.00 | 2.05 | 1.84 | 1.86 |
7 | 2.30 | 2.20 | 2.68 | 2.34 | 2.35 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 2.46 | 2.28 | 2.42 | 2.47 | 2.49 |
8 | 1.91 | 1.78 | 2.07 | 2.22 | 2.22 | 2.04 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 2.33 | 1.98 | 2.06 |
9 | 2.10 | 2.04 | 2.26 | 1.96 | 2.23 | 2.00 | 2.28 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.02 | 1.96 |
10 | 2.40 | 2.27 | 2.35 | 2.14 | 1.77 | 2.05 | 2.42 | 2.33 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 2.11 |
11 | 1.95 | 2.22 | 2.20 | 1.95 | 1.79 | 1.84 | 2.47 | 1.98 | 2.02 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
12 | 2.20 | 2.17 | 2.39 | 1.69 | 1.95 | 1.86 | 2.49 | 2.06 | 1.96 | 2.11 | 1.74 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.72 |
2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
3 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
4 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.80 |
5 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
6 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
7 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
8 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
9 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
10 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
11 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.79 |
12 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013