| Project Name | ECE51K |
| Project Name | ECE51K |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 173.3 | 169.4 | 160.5 | 148.3 | 143.5 | 138.1 | 102.5 | 77.8 | 70.9 | 30.3 | 26.9 | 13.4 |
| Cluster size | 239 | 324 | 260 | 240 | 213 | 268 | 151 | 92 | 87 | 56 | 33 | 37 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 8.88 | 9.22 | 7.75 | 7.45 | 8.06 | 8.05 | 9.11 | 10.50 | 7.46 | 8.27 | 6.20 | 9.08 |
| GDT_TS | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.45 | 0.40 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.93 | 5.32 | 3.57 | 5.53 | 3.91 | 5.82 | 7.01 | 5.47 | 2.41 | 6.37 | 4.97 |
| 2 | 4.93 | 0.00 | 6.95 | 7.24 | 7.40 | 6.21 | 6.63 | 8.85 | 5.58 | 6.33 | 5.79 | 7.04 |
| 3 | 5.32 | 6.95 | 0.00 | 5.40 | 6.95 | 3.22 | 4.49 | 6.10 | 7.06 | 4.21 | 7.58 | 5.19 |
| 4 | 3.57 | 7.24 | 5.40 | 0.00 | 6.40 | 4.84 | 7.15 | 7.64 | 6.77 | 2.98 | 7.08 | 5.79 |
| 5 | 5.53 | 7.40 | 6.95 | 6.40 | 0.00 | 6.40 | 6.93 | 6.59 | 6.82 | 5.39 | 8.01 | 6.36 |
| 6 | 3.91 | 6.21 | 3.22 | 4.84 | 6.40 | 0.00 | 5.18 | 6.87 | 5.07 | 3.36 | 5.82 | 3.31 |
| 7 | 5.82 | 6.63 | 4.49 | 7.15 | 6.93 | 5.18 | 0.00 | 3.42 | 7.85 | 5.64 | 8.48 | 7.10 |
| 8 | 7.01 | 8.85 | 6.10 | 7.64 | 6.59 | 6.87 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 9.43 | 6.39 | 10.40 | 8.08 |
| 9 | 5.47 | 5.58 | 7.06 | 6.77 | 6.82 | 5.07 | 7.85 | 9.43 | 0.00 | 6.03 | 2.22 | 3.86 |
| 10 | 2.41 | 6.33 | 4.21 | 2.98 | 5.39 | 3.36 | 5.64 | 6.39 | 6.03 | 0.00 | 6.93 | 4.57 |
| 11 | 6.37 | 5.79 | 7.58 | 7.08 | 8.01 | 5.82 | 8.48 | 10.40 | 2.22 | 6.93 | 0.00 | 5.25 |
| 12 | 4.97 | 7.04 | 5.19 | 5.79 | 6.36 | 3.31 | 7.10 | 8.08 | 3.86 | 4.57 | 5.25 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.41 | 0.77 | 0.37 | 0.52 |
| 2 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.46 |
| 3 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.52 |
| 4 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.72 | 0.38 | 0.46 |
| 5 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.71 |
| 6 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.61 |
| 7 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.40 | 0.42 |
| 8 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.37 | 0.40 |
| 9 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.75 | 0.61 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.53 |
| 11 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.75 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0.58 |
| 12 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013