| Project Name | katie54 |
| Project Name | katie54 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 211.4 | 131.0 | 117.3 | 102.0 | 100.1 | 67.3 | 54.0 | 51.0 | 47.3 | 47.1 | 34.5 | 30.3 |
| Cluster size | 387 | 326 | 268 | 190 | 168 | 147 | 117 | 87 | 97 | 70 | 77 | 66 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.32 | 3.83 | 4.17 | 4.78 | 4.37 | 4.66 | 4.49 | 4.08 | 4.03 | 4.05 | 4.15 | 4.40 |
| GDT_TS | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.54 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.54 | 1.61 | 1.20 | 2.22 | 1.67 | 2.27 | 2.74 | 3.17 | 3.38 | 3.08 | 1.49 |
| 2 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.04 | 1.87 | 1.94 | 1.89 | 2.22 | 2.02 | 2.54 | 2.88 | 2.75 | 1.50 |
| 3 | 1.61 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 1.95 | 1.40 | 2.49 | 2.34 | 2.68 | 2.79 | 2.80 | 1.47 |
| 4 | 1.20 | 1.87 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 1.82 | 2.10 | 3.13 | 3.36 | 3.36 | 3.16 | 1.78 |
| 5 | 2.22 | 1.94 | 1.95 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 2.47 | 2.77 | 2.79 | 2.26 | 2.84 | 1.82 |
| 6 | 1.67 | 1.89 | 1.40 | 1.82 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 2.76 | 3.02 | 3.20 | 2.89 | 2.04 |
| 7 | 2.27 | 2.22 | 2.49 | 2.10 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.72 | 3.25 | 2.47 | 2.74 |
| 8 | 2.74 | 2.02 | 2.34 | 3.13 | 2.77 | 2.76 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 3.71 | 2.49 | 2.68 |
| 9 | 3.17 | 2.54 | 2.68 | 3.36 | 2.79 | 3.02 | 2.72 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 1.69 | 2.98 |
| 10 | 3.38 | 2.88 | 2.79 | 3.36 | 2.26 | 3.20 | 3.25 | 3.71 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 3.05 |
| 11 | 3.08 | 2.75 | 2.80 | 3.16 | 2.84 | 2.89 | 2.47 | 2.49 | 1.69 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 2.96 |
| 12 | 1.49 | 1.50 | 1.47 | 1.78 | 1.82 | 2.04 | 2.74 | 2.68 | 2.98 | 3.05 | 2.96 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 0.83 |
| 3 | 0.83 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.85 |
| 4 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.84 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.80 |
| 6 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.82 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| 9 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 0.83 |
| 10 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.87 |
| 12 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.87 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013