Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 160.1 | 154.3 | 153.1 | 135.2 | 132.4 | 128.1 | 127.0 | 94.9 | 82.8 | 70.9 | 69.7 | 54.8 |
Cluster size | 236 | 222 | 245 | 190 | 204 | 175 | 194 | 137 | 122 | 98 | 103 | 74 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.84 | 2.83 | 3.10 | 2.86 | 2.79 | 3.44 | 2.83 | 2.90 | 2.96 | 2.85 | 3.02 | 2.56 |
GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.79 | 2.02 | 1.91 | 1.84 | 2.17 | 2.08 | 1.80 | 1.67 | 2.30 | 1.81 | 2.21 |
2 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 2.06 | 1.84 | 2.21 | 2.11 | 1.90 | 1.91 | 2.63 | 2.07 | 2.11 |
3 | 2.02 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.25 | 2.33 | 2.26 | 2.08 | 1.99 | 2.44 | 2.03 | 2.51 |
4 | 1.91 | 2.06 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 2.29 | 2.02 | 2.18 | 1.96 | 2.19 | 1.96 | 2.43 |
5 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 2.25 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.33 | 2.00 | 2.09 | 2.52 | 2.22 | 2.15 |
6 | 2.17 | 2.21 | 2.33 | 2.29 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.02 | 2.18 | 2.46 | 2.07 | 2.56 |
7 | 2.08 | 2.11 | 2.26 | 2.02 | 2.33 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.07 | 2.43 | 2.22 | 2.26 |
8 | 1.80 | 1.90 | 2.08 | 2.18 | 2.00 | 2.02 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.85 | 2.26 | 2.05 | 2.41 |
9 | 1.67 | 1.91 | 1.99 | 1.96 | 2.09 | 2.18 | 2.07 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 1.77 | 2.09 |
10 | 2.30 | 2.63 | 2.44 | 2.19 | 2.52 | 2.46 | 2.43 | 2.26 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 2.74 |
11 | 1.81 | 2.07 | 2.03 | 1.96 | 2.22 | 2.07 | 2.22 | 2.05 | 1.77 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 2.35 |
12 | 2.21 | 2.11 | 2.51 | 2.43 | 2.15 | 2.56 | 2.26 | 2.41 | 2.09 | 2.74 | 2.35 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.75 |
3 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
4 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
5 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
6 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
7 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
8 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
9 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
10 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
11 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 |
12 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013