| Project Name | controlhooper |
| Project Name | controlhooper |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 144.5 | 142.0 | 134.1 | 118.9 | 111.7 | 100.2 | 82.0 | 64.5 | 63.8 | 63.1 | 60.0 | 33.4 |
| Cluster size | 217 | 275 | 205 | 194 | 209 | 162 | 185 | 137 | 125 | 139 | 83 | 69 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.58 | 3.04 | 3.99 | 4.03 | 3.96 | 3.90 | 2.85 | 3.98 | 3.67 | 3.39 | 4.96 | 4.61 |
| GDT_TS | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 2.65 | 4.34 | 2.09 | 4.03 | 2.40 | 3.57 | 2.72 | 2.62 | 5.05 | 3.35 |
| 2 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 3.02 | 3.36 | 2.14 | 3.08 | 1.48 | 3.51 | 2.77 | 2.39 | 4.17 | 3.39 |
| 3 | 2.65 | 3.02 | 0.00 | 3.02 | 2.26 | 2.76 | 2.99 | 2.54 | 2.30 | 2.61 | 3.53 | 2.24 |
| 4 | 4.34 | 3.36 | 3.02 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 1.09 | 2.94 | 3.36 | 3.59 | 3.58 | 2.00 | 3.20 |
| 5 | 2.09 | 2.14 | 2.26 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 2.67 | 2.48 | 1.34 | 1.36 | 3.89 | 2.70 |
| 6 | 4.03 | 3.08 | 2.76 | 1.09 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 3.24 | 3.39 | 3.40 | 2.36 | 3.29 |
| 7 | 2.40 | 1.48 | 2.99 | 2.94 | 2.67 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 3.49 | 3.16 | 2.79 | 3.82 | 3.51 |
| 8 | 3.57 | 3.51 | 2.54 | 3.36 | 2.48 | 3.24 | 3.49 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.35 | 3.47 | 2.26 |
| 9 | 2.72 | 2.77 | 2.30 | 3.59 | 1.34 | 3.39 | 3.16 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 3.91 | 2.89 |
| 10 | 2.62 | 2.39 | 2.61 | 3.58 | 1.36 | 3.40 | 2.79 | 2.35 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 3.01 |
| 11 | 5.05 | 4.17 | 3.53 | 2.00 | 3.89 | 2.36 | 3.82 | 3.47 | 3.91 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 3.27 |
| 12 | 3.35 | 3.39 | 2.24 | 3.20 | 2.70 | 3.29 | 3.51 | 2.26 | 2.89 | 3.01 | 3.27 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.88 |
| 4 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.98 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.66 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.82 |
| 6 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.98 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.70 |
| 7 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| 8 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.71 | 0.80 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.86 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| 10 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.82 |
| 11 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013