| Project Name | b |
| Project Name | b |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 148.5 | 144.6 | 134.0 | 133.5 | 124.8 | 121.7 | 104.6 | 101.8 | 92.0 | 72.1 | 66.3 | 47.3 |
| Cluster size | 233 | 228 | 195 | 206 | 188 | 187 | 165 | 161 | 149 | 111 | 107 | 70 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.68 | 2.49 | 2.73 | 2.42 | 2.61 | 2.59 | 2.44 | 2.37 | 2.43 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 2.31 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 2.76 | 2.07 | 2.09 | 2.13 | 2.06 | 1.79 | 2.49 | 2.19 | 1.93 | 2.40 |
| 2 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.87 | 1.97 | 2.20 | 1.95 | 2.11 | 2.01 | 2.91 | 1.89 | 2.34 | 2.07 |
| 3 | 2.76 | 2.87 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.38 | 2.70 | 2.91 | 2.49 | 2.17 | 2.77 | 2.45 | 3.04 |
| 4 | 2.07 | 1.97 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 2.03 | 2.18 | 1.83 | 2.30 | 2.17 | 2.03 | 2.36 |
| 5 | 2.09 | 2.20 | 2.38 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.25 | 2.01 | 2.56 | 2.21 | 2.18 | 2.52 |
| 6 | 2.13 | 1.95 | 2.70 | 2.03 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 2.05 | 2.50 | 1.85 | 2.46 | 2.49 |
| 7 | 2.06 | 2.11 | 2.91 | 2.18 | 2.25 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 2.35 | 2.06 | 2.48 | 2.27 |
| 8 | 1.79 | 2.01 | 2.49 | 1.83 | 2.01 | 2.05 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 2.12 | 1.64 | 2.43 |
| 9 | 2.49 | 2.91 | 2.17 | 2.30 | 2.56 | 2.50 | 2.35 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.22 | 2.86 |
| 10 | 2.19 | 1.89 | 2.77 | 2.17 | 2.21 | 1.85 | 2.06 | 2.12 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.64 |
| 11 | 1.93 | 2.34 | 2.45 | 2.03 | 2.18 | 2.46 | 2.48 | 1.64 | 2.22 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.64 |
| 12 | 2.40 | 2.07 | 3.04 | 2.36 | 2.52 | 2.49 | 2.27 | 2.43 | 2.86 | 2.64 | 2.64 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.72 |
| 2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| 3 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.77 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| 7 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 8 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.73 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| 11 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013