| Project Name | 9b |
| Project Name | 9b |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 149.2 | 133.7 | 128.9 | 122.3 | 120.3 | 117.7 | 112.2 | 110.9 | 108.2 | 100.0 | 56.2 | 52.5 |
| Cluster size | 217 | 201 | 184 | 157 | 170 | 206 | 154 | 166 | 172 | 171 | 105 | 97 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.81 | 4.43 | 4.53 | 3.82 | 5.09 | 5.66 | 7.38 | 4.58 | 6.28 | 4.49 | 5.55 | 5.62 |
| GDT_TS | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.46 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 5.53 | 2.71 | 2.60 | 2.16 | 3.98 | 5.02 | 1.89 | 4.10 | 4.74 | 4.42 | 4.84 |
| 2 | 5.53 | 0.00 | 5.64 | 5.48 | 6.02 | 4.15 | 6.54 | 5.95 | 4.93 | 2.19 | 3.76 | 3.44 |
| 3 | 2.71 | 5.64 | 0.00 | 1.72 | 3.74 | 3.52 | 4.55 | 3.49 | 4.02 | 5.02 | 4.51 | 4.80 |
| 4 | 2.60 | 5.48 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 3.26 | 4.22 | 5.56 | 2.84 | 4.82 | 4.98 | 5.03 | 5.30 |
| 5 | 2.16 | 6.02 | 3.74 | 3.26 | 0.00 | 5.08 | 5.60 | 2.39 | 5.01 | 5.01 | 5.00 | 5.36 |
| 6 | 3.98 | 4.15 | 3.52 | 4.22 | 5.08 | 0.00 | 3.14 | 5.10 | 1.71 | 3.49 | 2.91 | 2.92 |
| 7 | 5.02 | 6.54 | 4.55 | 5.56 | 5.60 | 3.14 | 0.00 | 6.17 | 2.46 | 5.55 | 3.74 | 4.17 |
| 8 | 1.89 | 5.95 | 3.49 | 2.84 | 2.39 | 5.10 | 6.17 | 0.00 | 5.21 | 5.51 | 5.55 | 5.89 |
| 9 | 4.10 | 4.93 | 4.02 | 4.82 | 5.01 | 1.71 | 2.46 | 5.21 | 0.00 | 4.04 | 2.98 | 3.07 |
| 10 | 4.74 | 2.19 | 5.02 | 4.98 | 5.01 | 3.49 | 5.55 | 5.51 | 4.04 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 2.34 |
| 11 | 4.42 | 3.76 | 4.51 | 5.03 | 5.00 | 2.91 | 3.74 | 5.55 | 2.98 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| 12 | 4.84 | 3.44 | 4.80 | 5.30 | 5.36 | 2.92 | 4.17 | 5.89 | 3.07 | 2.34 | 1.70 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| 2 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| 4 | 0.76 | 0.52 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.65 |
| 5 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
| 6 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.88 | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.66 |
| 8 | 0.84 | 0.50 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.67 |
| 9 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.81 |
| 11 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.86 |
| 12 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013