Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 208.6 | 187.5 | 159.9 | 154.4 | 137.0 | 116.6 | 112.0 | 86.0 | 85.9 | 69.7 | 61.2 | 57.1 |
Cluster size | 300 | 258 | 237 | 214 | 194 | 169 | 162 | 109 | 122 | 85 | 80 | 70 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.01 | 2.97 | 3.31 | 2.83 | 3.32 | 2.95 | 3.28 | 3.16 | 3.27 | 3.03 | 2.82 | 3.45 |
GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 2.00 | 2.18 | 2.03 | 2.27 | 1.99 | 2.02 | 2.44 | 2.42 | 2.76 | 2.73 |
2 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 1.65 | 1.86 | 2.01 | 2.12 | 1.78 | 1.66 | 2.00 | 2.53 | 2.60 | 2.10 |
3 | 2.00 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 1.92 | 2.20 | 1.87 | 1.79 | 2.24 | 2.60 | 2.72 | 2.15 |
4 | 2.18 | 1.86 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 2.14 | 2.16 | 1.96 | 2.27 | 2.35 | 2.62 | 2.43 |
5 | 2.03 | 2.01 | 1.92 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 2.26 | 1.83 | 2.42 | 2.57 | 2.73 | 2.64 |
6 | 2.27 | 2.12 | 2.20 | 2.14 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.02 | 2.46 | 2.56 | 2.47 | 2.51 |
7 | 1.99 | 1.78 | 1.87 | 2.16 | 2.26 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.23 | 2.51 | 2.71 | 2.25 |
8 | 2.02 | 1.66 | 1.79 | 1.96 | 1.83 | 2.02 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.22 | 2.46 | 2.32 |
9 | 2.44 | 2.00 | 2.24 | 2.27 | 2.42 | 2.46 | 2.23 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.50 | 1.62 |
10 | 2.42 | 2.53 | 2.60 | 2.35 | 2.57 | 2.56 | 2.51 | 2.22 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 2.62 |
11 | 2.76 | 2.60 | 2.72 | 2.62 | 2.73 | 2.47 | 2.71 | 2.46 | 2.50 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 2.62 |
12 | 2.73 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 2.43 | 2.64 | 2.51 | 2.25 | 2.32 | 1.62 | 2.62 | 2.62 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
3 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.78 |
4 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
5 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
6 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
7 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
8 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
9 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.82 |
10 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
11 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
12 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013