| Project Name | E51K |
| Project Name | E51K |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 121.7 | 105.8 | 67.6 | 65.5 | 62.3 | 58.7 | 57.0 | 54.3 | 50.9 | 47.4 | 40.7 | 30.6 |
| Cluster size | 360 | 230 | 172 | 176 | 131 | 112 | 131 | 185 | 168 | 156 | 81 | 98 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 3.0 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.97 | 3.60 | 5.15 | 3.62 | 8.17 | 9.29 | 8.20 | 5.36 | 4.43 | 6.99 | 7.69 | 7.41 |
| GDT_TS | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.94 | 1.48 | 3.99 | 5.17 | 6.28 | 5.21 | 4.59 | 4.65 | 4.32 | 4.51 | 7.07 |
| 2 | 3.94 | 0.00 | 4.20 | 1.18 | 6.74 | 7.88 | 6.78 | 3.55 | 1.84 | 5.89 | 6.14 | 6.77 |
| 3 | 1.48 | 4.20 | 0.00 | 4.27 | 4.26 | 5.51 | 4.43 | 4.13 | 5.02 | 3.41 | 3.89 | 6.97 |
| 4 | 3.99 | 1.18 | 4.27 | 0.00 | 6.68 | 7.96 | 6.84 | 3.39 | 2.10 | 5.93 | 5.94 | 7.02 |
| 5 | 5.17 | 6.74 | 4.26 | 6.68 | 0.00 | 3.06 | 2.10 | 5.09 | 7.24 | 3.11 | 2.21 | 8.00 |
| 6 | 6.28 | 7.88 | 5.51 | 7.96 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 6.18 | 8.16 | 3.93 | 4.04 | 7.48 |
| 7 | 5.21 | 6.78 | 4.43 | 6.84 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 5.07 | 7.19 | 2.99 | 3.33 | 6.89 |
| 8 | 4.59 | 3.55 | 4.13 | 3.39 | 5.09 | 6.18 | 5.07 | 0.00 | 3.97 | 4.04 | 5.15 | 6.61 |
| 9 | 4.65 | 1.84 | 5.02 | 2.10 | 7.24 | 8.16 | 7.19 | 3.97 | 0.00 | 6.40 | 6.73 | 6.01 |
| 10 | 4.32 | 5.89 | 3.41 | 5.93 | 3.11 | 3.93 | 2.99 | 4.04 | 6.40 | 0.00 | 3.96 | 6.52 |
| 11 | 4.51 | 6.14 | 3.89 | 5.94 | 2.21 | 4.04 | 3.33 | 5.15 | 6.73 | 3.96 | 0.00 | 8.62 |
| 12 | 7.07 | 6.77 | 6.97 | 7.02 | 8.00 | 7.48 | 6.89 | 6.61 | 6.01 | 6.52 | 8.62 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.96 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
| 2 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.94 | 0.62 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.77 |
| 3 | 0.96 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 0.58 |
| 4 | 0.62 | 0.94 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.78 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.86 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 0.61 |
| 6 | 0.68 | 0.49 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.54 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.62 |
| 8 | 0.59 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0.87 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.76 |
| 9 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 0.89 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.69 |
| 10 | 0.88 | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.61 |
| 11 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.58 |
| 12 | 0.59 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013