| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant89 |
| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant89 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 143.4 | 107.9 | 67.4 | 63.8 | 61.0 | 59.6 | 59.2 | 50.9 | 46.3 | 38.6 | 32.9 | 29.2 |
| Cluster size | 333 | 291 | 168 | 181 | 187 | 125 | 180 | 153 | 155 | 107 | 64 | 56 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.34 | 4.36 | 4.94 | 6.71 | 4.98 | 7.38 | 5.11 | 5.43 | 5.67 | 4.18 | 9.06 | 8.35 |
| GDT_TS | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 3.52 | 4.59 | 2.11 | 4.55 | 3.11 | 3.86 | 4.20 | 2.51 | 6.58 | 5.74 |
| 2 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 3.89 | 4.14 | 2.45 | 5.07 | 3.47 | 3.87 | 3.85 | 3.29 | 6.71 | 6.07 |
| 3 | 3.52 | 3.89 | 0.00 | 5.29 | 3.95 | 4.74 | 3.81 | 4.91 | 5.28 | 3.60 | 6.72 | 6.04 |
| 4 | 4.59 | 4.14 | 5.29 | 0.00 | 3.82 | 5.28 | 3.84 | 3.36 | 2.75 | 5.71 | 4.33 | 4.80 |
| 5 | 2.11 | 2.45 | 3.95 | 3.82 | 0.00 | 4.34 | 2.72 | 3.21 | 3.61 | 3.55 | 5.70 | 4.97 |
| 6 | 4.55 | 5.07 | 4.74 | 5.28 | 4.34 | 0.00 | 5.38 | 6.20 | 6.34 | 5.78 | 4.46 | 3.38 |
| 7 | 3.11 | 3.47 | 3.81 | 3.84 | 2.72 | 5.38 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 2.78 | 3.28 | 6.26 | 5.87 |
| 8 | 3.86 | 3.87 | 4.91 | 3.36 | 3.21 | 6.20 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 4.21 | 6.27 | 6.07 |
| 9 | 4.20 | 3.85 | 5.28 | 2.75 | 3.61 | 6.34 | 2.78 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 4.86 | 6.21 | 6.39 |
| 10 | 2.51 | 3.29 | 3.60 | 5.71 | 3.55 | 5.78 | 3.28 | 4.21 | 4.86 | 0.00 | 7.84 | 7.05 |
| 11 | 6.58 | 6.71 | 6.72 | 4.33 | 5.70 | 4.46 | 6.26 | 6.27 | 6.21 | 7.84 | 0.00 | 2.35 |
| 12 | 5.74 | 6.07 | 6.04 | 4.80 | 4.97 | 3.38 | 5.87 | 6.07 | 6.39 | 7.05 | 2.35 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.61 |
| 2 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.60 | 0.57 |
| 3 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.55 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| 5 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 0.61 |
| 6 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
| 8 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.58 |
| 9 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.54 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.54 |
| 11 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.91 |
| 12 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.91 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013