Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 266.6 | 198.1 | 146.5 | 136.5 | 123.3 | 114.5 | 109.3 | 106.4 | 92.4 | 69.6 | 66.0 | 65.7 |
Cluster size | 364 | 274 | 197 | 183 | 171 | 158 | 137 | 139 | 118 | 76 | 90 | 93 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 4.29 | 3.83 | 3.88 | 3.96 | 3.87 | 3.63 | 4.28 | 4.07 | 3.99 | 3.44 | 3.48 | 3.58 |
GDT_TS | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 2.52 | 2.32 | 3.52 | 3.75 | 2.55 | 2.27 | 2.64 | 3.23 | 4.30 | 3.71 |
2 | 2.41 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.31 | 3.19 | 3.61 | 2.13 | 2.33 | 2.25 | 3.00 | 3.82 | 3.38 |
3 | 2.52 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.72 | 3.42 | 3.41 | 2.89 | 2.28 | 2.64 | 2.60 | 3.70 | 3.17 |
4 | 2.32 | 2.31 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 3.32 | 3.78 | 2.25 | 2.24 | 2.27 | 3.26 | 4.18 | 3.86 |
5 | 3.52 | 3.19 | 3.42 | 3.32 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 3.59 | 3.51 | 3.81 | 3.04 | 3.47 | 3.06 |
6 | 3.75 | 3.61 | 3.41 | 3.78 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 3.70 | 3.81 | 4.19 | 3.08 | 2.73 | 2.21 |
7 | 2.55 | 2.13 | 2.89 | 2.25 | 3.59 | 3.70 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 2.68 | 3.58 | 4.16 | 3.70 |
8 | 2.27 | 2.33 | 2.28 | 2.24 | 3.51 | 3.81 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 2.81 | 4.14 | 3.72 |
9 | 2.64 | 2.25 | 2.64 | 2.27 | 3.81 | 4.19 | 2.68 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 4.26 | 3.87 |
10 | 3.23 | 3.00 | 2.60 | 3.26 | 3.04 | 3.08 | 3.58 | 2.81 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 3.30 | 2.93 |
11 | 4.30 | 3.82 | 3.70 | 4.18 | 3.47 | 2.73 | 4.16 | 4.14 | 4.26 | 3.30 | 0.00 | 2.57 |
12 | 3.71 | 3.38 | 3.17 | 3.86 | 3.06 | 2.21 | 3.70 | 3.72 | 3.87 | 2.93 | 2.57 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.58 |
2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.60 |
3 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
4 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.59 |
5 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.72 |
6 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
7 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.58 |
8 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.62 |
9 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.56 |
10 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.71 |
11 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
12 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013