| Project Name | Mutation6BoundNK |
| Project Name | Mutation6BoundNK |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 149.7 | 108.2 | 88.2 | 78.3 | 68.3 | 61.4 | 51.9 | 48.8 | 38.5 | 37.5 | 35.7 | 29.4 |
| Cluster size | 370 | 232 | 218 | 186 | 201 | 170 | 155 | 153 | 79 | 107 | 80 | 49 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.74 | 4.36 | 4.88 | 4.62 | 4.83 | 5.29 | 4.34 | 5.25 | 6.17 | 5.88 | 4.24 | 7.24 |
| GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.42 | 1.37 | 1.58 | 2.19 | 3.03 | 2.51 | 2.92 | 4.63 | 3.80 | 2.44 | 5.80 |
| 2 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 1.17 | 1.27 | 2.13 | 3.19 | 2.43 | 3.00 | 5.09 | 4.08 | 2.35 | 6.10 |
| 3 | 1.37 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.01 | 2.11 | 2.79 | 2.39 | 2.69 | 4.67 | 3.78 | 2.32 | 5.80 |
| 4 | 1.58 | 1.27 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.97 | 2.03 | 2.82 | 4.64 | 3.78 | 2.62 | 5.85 |
| 5 | 2.19 | 2.13 | 2.11 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 2.49 | 2.61 | 4.41 | 3.64 | 2.68 | 5.44 |
| 6 | 3.03 | 3.19 | 2.79 | 2.97 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 2.65 | 1.30 | 2.95 | 2.06 | 4.03 | 3.93 |
| 7 | 2.51 | 2.43 | 2.39 | 2.03 | 2.49 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 3.66 | 2.94 | 3.87 | 4.82 |
| 8 | 2.92 | 3.00 | 2.69 | 2.82 | 2.61 | 1.30 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 2.26 | 3.98 | 3.95 |
| 9 | 4.63 | 5.09 | 4.67 | 4.64 | 4.41 | 2.95 | 3.66 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 1.74 | 6.01 | 2.22 |
| 10 | 3.80 | 4.08 | 3.78 | 3.78 | 3.64 | 2.06 | 2.94 | 2.26 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 5.26 | 2.71 |
| 11 | 2.44 | 2.35 | 2.32 | 2.62 | 2.68 | 4.03 | 3.87 | 3.98 | 6.01 | 5.26 | 0.00 | 7.23 |
| 12 | 5.80 | 6.10 | 5.80 | 5.85 | 5.44 | 3.93 | 4.82 | 3.95 | 2.22 | 2.71 | 7.23 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.82 |
| 2 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.78 |
| 3 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.80 |
| 4 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| 5 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
| 7 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
| 8 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.83 |
| 9 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.87 |
| 10 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.85 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| 12 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013