| Project Name | Bsubt_AprE |
| Project Name | Bsubt_AprE |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 162.2 | 155.7 | 143.5 | 133.0 | 111.0 | 109.3 | 104.7 | 95.5 | 87.1 | 79.2 | 77.2 | 60.0 |
| Cluster size | 240 | 231 | 224 | 211 | 173 | 163 | 164 | 144 | 127 | 116 | 119 | 88 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.98 | 3.11 | 2.94 | 3.10 | 2.76 | 3.70 | 2.84 | 3.08 | 3.45 | 3.25 | 3.01 | 3.09 |
| GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.45 | 2.60 | 2.27 | 2.47 | 2.31 | 2.68 | 2.54 | 2.40 | 2.49 | 2.39 |
| 2 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.64 | 2.56 | 2.92 | 2.63 | 2.40 | 2.85 | 2.48 | 2.39 | 2.70 |
| 3 | 2.45 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.43 | 2.63 | 2.37 | 2.80 | 2.37 | 2.44 | 1.86 | 2.24 |
| 4 | 2.60 | 2.64 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.95 | 2.52 | 2.85 | 2.97 | 2.68 | 2.68 | 2.30 | 2.22 |
| 5 | 2.27 | 2.56 | 2.43 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 2.11 | 2.81 | 2.51 | 2.61 | 2.34 | 2.47 |
| 6 | 2.47 | 2.92 | 2.63 | 2.52 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 3.34 | 2.60 | 2.52 | 2.53 | 2.42 |
| 7 | 2.31 | 2.63 | 2.37 | 2.85 | 2.11 | 2.83 | 0.00 | 2.82 | 2.45 | 2.62 | 2.18 | 2.44 |
| 8 | 2.68 | 2.40 | 2.80 | 2.97 | 2.81 | 3.34 | 2.82 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 2.55 | 2.70 | 2.83 |
| 9 | 2.54 | 2.85 | 2.37 | 2.68 | 2.51 | 2.60 | 2.45 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 2.19 | 2.28 |
| 10 | 2.40 | 2.48 | 2.44 | 2.68 | 2.61 | 2.52 | 2.62 | 2.55 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.20 |
| 11 | 2.49 | 2.39 | 1.86 | 2.30 | 2.34 | 2.53 | 2.18 | 2.70 | 2.19 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
| 12 | 2.39 | 2.70 | 2.24 | 2.22 | 2.47 | 2.42 | 2.44 | 2.83 | 2.28 | 2.20 | 2.04 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.73 |
| 6 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| 11 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013