| Project Name | 340 |
| Project Name | 340 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 135.0 | 130.7 | 95.3 | 90.9 | 88.6 | 85.3 | 76.0 | 73.2 | 71.2 | 67.6 | 64.2 | 38.1 |
| Cluster size | 218 | 217 | 187 | 168 | 170 | 164 | 168 | 213 | 128 | 145 | 134 | 88 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 7.90 | 8.32 | 7.76 | 7.94 | 3.34 | 4.84 | 4.80 | 6.12 | 5.19 | 4.07 | 7.96 | 3.18 |
| GDT_TS | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 3.15 | 2.76 | 8.07 | 8.27 | 9.04 | 7.11 | 8.16 | 8.28 | 5.18 | 8.09 |
| 2 | 2.99 | 0.00 | 4.57 | 4.04 | 8.44 | 8.37 | 9.37 | 7.40 | 8.49 | 8.76 | 5.56 | 8.62 |
| 3 | 3.15 | 4.57 | 0.00 | 2.06 | 7.97 | 8.23 | 9.40 | 6.03 | 8.04 | 8.09 | 4.17 | 7.73 |
| 4 | 2.76 | 4.04 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 8.15 | 7.91 | 9.08 | 5.95 | 7.73 | 8.10 | 3.71 | 7.93 |
| 5 | 8.07 | 8.44 | 7.97 | 8.15 | 0.00 | 4.79 | 4.12 | 6.41 | 4.98 | 3.01 | 8.44 | 3.22 |
| 6 | 8.27 | 8.37 | 8.23 | 7.91 | 4.79 | 0.00 | 4.33 | 4.37 | 3.67 | 4.33 | 7.03 | 4.68 |
| 7 | 9.04 | 9.37 | 9.40 | 9.08 | 4.12 | 4.33 | 0.00 | 6.91 | 4.28 | 3.77 | 9.16 | 4.58 |
| 8 | 7.11 | 7.40 | 6.03 | 5.95 | 6.41 | 4.37 | 6.91 | 0.00 | 4.94 | 5.87 | 4.51 | 5.88 |
| 9 | 8.16 | 8.49 | 8.04 | 7.73 | 4.98 | 3.67 | 4.28 | 4.94 | 0.00 | 3.86 | 7.05 | 4.89 |
| 10 | 8.28 | 8.76 | 8.09 | 8.10 | 3.01 | 4.33 | 3.77 | 5.87 | 3.86 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 3.27 |
| 11 | 5.18 | 5.56 | 4.17 | 3.71 | 8.44 | 7.03 | 9.16 | 4.51 | 7.05 | 8.00 | 0.00 | 7.99 |
| 12 | 8.09 | 8.62 | 7.73 | 7.93 | 3.22 | 4.68 | 4.58 | 5.88 | 4.89 | 3.27 | 7.99 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.58 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.59 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.58 |
| 4 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.58 |
| 5 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.69 |
| 6 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
| 7 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.58 |
| 9 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.55 |
| 10 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.62 |
| 11 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
| 12 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013