| Project Name | 43N |
| Project Name | 43N |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 415.9 | 411.6 | 396.0 | 297.1 | 193.2 | 154.5 | 134.1 | 115.4 | 89.0 | 75.9 | 54.1 | 37.9 |
| Cluster size | 314 | 290 | 305 | 222 | 187 | 170 | 128 | 108 | 101 | 75 | 55 | 45 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.38 | 6.03 | 7.16 | 6.57 | 6.76 | 6.55 | 5.71 | 5.69 | 6.53 | 5.20 | 5.43 | 7.64 |
| GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.97 | 0.57 | 0.87 | 1.90 | 2.37 | 2.33 | 1.59 | 2.73 | 2.20 | 1.67 |
| 2 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.42 | 0.85 | 1.14 | 1.84 | 2.28 | 2.10 | 1.63 | 2.47 | 2.01 | 1.90 |
| 3 | 0.97 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 1.90 | 2.72 | 2.67 | 1.63 | 3.18 | 2.66 | 1.28 |
| 4 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 1.76 | 2.37 | 2.28 | 1.46 | 2.74 | 2.24 | 1.53 |
| 5 | 0.87 | 1.14 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.61 | 2.31 | 2.21 | 1.27 | 2.70 | 2.18 | 1.42 |
| 6 | 1.90 | 1.84 | 1.90 | 1.76 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 1.52 | 1.74 | 2.16 | 2.40 | 2.09 |
| 7 | 2.37 | 2.28 | 2.72 | 2.37 | 2.31 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 1.78 | 1.84 | 0.95 | 3.06 |
| 8 | 2.33 | 2.10 | 2.67 | 2.28 | 2.21 | 1.52 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 0.82 | 1.48 | 2.93 |
| 9 | 1.59 | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.46 | 1.27 | 1.74 | 1.78 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 1.57 | 1.97 |
| 10 | 2.73 | 2.47 | 3.18 | 2.74 | 2.70 | 2.16 | 1.84 | 0.82 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 3.49 |
| 11 | 2.20 | 2.01 | 2.66 | 2.24 | 2.18 | 2.40 | 0.95 | 1.48 | 1.57 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 2.99 |
| 12 | 1.67 | 1.90 | 1.28 | 1.53 | 1.42 | 2.09 | 3.06 | 2.93 | 1.97 | 3.49 | 2.99 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.86 |
| 2 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.87 |
| 3 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.89 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.89 |
| 5 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.92 |
| 6 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.92 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.75 |
| 8 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.83 |
| 9 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
| 10 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.77 |
| 12 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013