| Project Name | smitainfo |
| Project Name | smitainfo |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 142.1 | 128.2 | 124.1 | 112.7 | 100.6 | 98.3 | 77.8 | 77.6 | 69.0 | 66.4 | 65.1 | 42.4 |
| Cluster size | 251 | 268 | 255 | 201 | 179 | 179 | 132 | 137 | 114 | 110 | 105 | 69 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 7.07 | 6.62 | 5.77 | 7.30 | 6.32 | 6.61 | 6.82 | 7.35 | 6.89 | 6.94 | 7.24 | 6.62 |
| GDT_TS | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.35 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.28 | 4.55 | 3.24 | 3.77 | 3.71 | 4.31 | 4.96 | 3.82 | 4.70 | 3.84 | 5.28 |
| 2 | 4.28 | 0.00 | 3.75 | 4.14 | 3.46 | 3.83 | 3.82 | 4.31 | 3.84 | 4.16 | 3.59 | 4.19 |
| 3 | 4.55 | 3.75 | 0.00 | 4.69 | 3.77 | 3.92 | 4.03 | 4.39 | 4.55 | 4.32 | 4.01 | 4.24 |
| 4 | 3.24 | 4.14 | 4.69 | 0.00 | 3.75 | 3.50 | 4.46 | 4.89 | 3.47 | 4.73 | 3.75 | 5.53 |
| 5 | 3.77 | 3.46 | 3.77 | 3.75 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 4.16 | 4.61 | 3.31 | 4.32 | 3.61 | 4.66 |
| 6 | 3.71 | 3.83 | 3.92 | 3.50 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 3.74 | 3.80 | 3.54 | 3.75 | 3.48 | 4.66 |
| 7 | 4.31 | 3.82 | 4.03 | 4.46 | 4.16 | 3.74 | 0.00 | 3.37 | 4.31 | 3.24 | 4.07 | 3.77 |
| 8 | 4.96 | 4.31 | 4.39 | 4.89 | 4.61 | 3.80 | 3.37 | 0.00 | 4.89 | 3.20 | 4.23 | 4.42 |
| 9 | 3.82 | 3.84 | 4.55 | 3.47 | 3.31 | 3.54 | 4.31 | 4.89 | 0.00 | 4.41 | 3.60 | 5.15 |
| 10 | 4.70 | 4.16 | 4.32 | 4.73 | 4.32 | 3.75 | 3.24 | 3.20 | 4.41 | 0.00 | 3.92 | 3.98 |
| 11 | 3.84 | 3.59 | 4.01 | 3.75 | 3.61 | 3.48 | 4.07 | 4.23 | 3.60 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 4.67 |
| 12 | 5.28 | 4.19 | 4.24 | 5.53 | 4.66 | 4.66 | 3.77 | 4.42 | 5.15 | 3.98 | 4.67 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.41 |
| 2 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.48 |
| 3 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.48 |
| 4 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.38 |
| 5 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.45 |
| 6 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.46 |
| 7 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.51 |
| 8 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.48 |
| 9 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.41 |
| 10 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
| 11 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.45 |
| 12 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013