Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
Cluster density | 119.6 | 90.3 | 67.6 | 64.6 | 60.8 | 58.2 | 35.5 | 32.3 | 27.0 | 20.6 | 19.7 |
Cluster size | 406 | 304 | 254 | 221 | 157 | 167 | 151 | 108 | 115 | 59 | 58 |
Average cluster RMSD | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
RMSD | 38.80 | 30.70 | 39.70 | 28.00 | 37.90 | 37.50 | 21.70 | 25.60 | 14.90 | 35.70 | 25.00 |
GDT_TS | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.29 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
1 | 0.00 | 14.80 | 5.12 | 15.80 | 7.16 | 7.99 | 22.10 | 18.10 | 27.40 | 10.90 | 19.40 |
2 | 14.80 | 0.00 | 15.40 | 5.86 | 12.10 | 15.50 | 13.80 | 9.26 | 19.00 | 8.26 | 11.60 |
3 | 5.12 | 15.40 | 0.00 | 16.50 | 9.09 | 5.83 | 23.30 | 19.10 | 28.10 | 11.60 | 20.50 |
4 | 15.80 | 5.86 | 16.50 | 0.00 | 12.90 | 16.00 | 10.20 | 5.17 | 16.30 | 9.90 | 8.31 |
5 | 7.16 | 12.10 | 9.09 | 12.90 | 0.00 | 10.40 | 20.00 | 15.30 | 26.00 | 7.30 | 16.90 |
6 | 7.99 | 15.50 | 5.83 | 16.00 | 10.40 | 0.00 | 21.90 | 18.10 | 25.90 | 12.60 | 18.40 |
7 | 22.10 | 13.80 | 23.30 | 10.20 | 20.00 | 21.90 | 0.00 | 6.68 | 10.60 | 17.80 | 7.17 |
8 | 18.10 | 9.26 | 19.10 | 5.17 | 15.30 | 18.10 | 6.68 | 0.00 | 14.10 | 12.90 | 5.99 |
9 | 27.40 | 19.00 | 28.10 | 16.30 | 26.00 | 25.90 | 10.60 | 14.10 | 0.00 | 23.40 | 13.00 |
10 | 10.90 | 8.26 | 11.60 | 9.90 | 7.30 | 12.60 | 17.80 | 12.90 | 23.40 | 0.00 | 14.40 |
11 | 19.40 | 11.60 | 20.50 | 8.31 | 16.90 | 18.40 | 7.17 | 5.99 | 13.00 | 14.40 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.30 |
2 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.54 | 0.43 |
3 | 0.53 | 0.37 | 1.00 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.29 |
4 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 0.55 |
5 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.47 |
6 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.54 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.26 |
7 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.60 |
8 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.27 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.69 |
9 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.46 |
10 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0.49 |
11 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013