| Project Name | 51amutation |
| Project Name | 51amutation |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 226.2 | 169.1 | 158.1 | 136.1 | 106.9 | 93.2 | 87.3 | 74.1 | 70.7 | 49.3 | 46.1 | 41.2 |
| Cluster size | 329 | 270 | 181 | 276 | 165 | 203 | 115 | 100 | 153 | 85 | 57 | 66 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.40 | 6.64 | 3.85 | 5.80 | 5.70 | 5.94 | 6.08 | 7.83 | 6.19 | 5.20 | 8.43 | 8.01 |
| GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.47 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.26 | 3.63 | 3.66 | 5.45 | 3.63 | 2.23 | 3.84 | 3.88 | 2.23 | 4.73 | 4.03 |
| 2 | 3.26 | 0.00 | 5.05 | 2.19 | 4.90 | 1.77 | 2.64 | 2.44 | 2.39 | 3.53 | 3.23 | 2.82 |
| 3 | 3.63 | 5.05 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.90 | 4.38 | 4.70 | 6.32 | 4.30 | 3.69 | 6.61 | 6.21 |
| 4 | 3.66 | 2.19 | 3.80 | 0.00 | 3.25 | 1.49 | 3.47 | 3.78 | 1.78 | 3.81 | 4.15 | 3.81 |
| 5 | 5.45 | 4.90 | 3.90 | 3.25 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 5.70 | 6.12 | 4.14 | 5.87 | 6.56 | 6.18 |
| 6 | 3.63 | 1.77 | 4.38 | 1.49 | 3.50 | 0.00 | 3.24 | 3.44 | 2.43 | 4.02 | 4.12 | 3.69 |
| 7 | 2.23 | 2.64 | 4.70 | 3.47 | 5.70 | 3.24 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 3.47 | 3.09 | 3.99 | 2.93 |
| 8 | 3.84 | 2.44 | 6.32 | 3.78 | 6.12 | 3.44 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 3.68 | 4.45 | 2.80 | 1.42 |
| 9 | 3.88 | 2.39 | 4.30 | 1.78 | 4.14 | 2.43 | 3.47 | 3.68 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 3.60 | 3.63 |
| 10 | 2.23 | 3.53 | 3.69 | 3.81 | 5.87 | 4.02 | 3.09 | 4.45 | 3.41 | 0.00 | 4.67 | 4.51 |
| 11 | 4.73 | 3.23 | 6.61 | 4.15 | 6.56 | 4.12 | 3.99 | 2.80 | 3.60 | 4.67 | 0.00 | 2.31 |
| 12 | 4.03 | 2.82 | 6.21 | 3.81 | 6.18 | 3.69 | 2.93 | 1.42 | 3.63 | 4.51 | 2.31 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.74 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.71 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
| 4 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| 5 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.48 |
| 6 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| 7 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.67 |
| 8 | 0.60 | 0.80 | 0.48 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.83 |
| 9 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| 10 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.66 |
| 11 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.88 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013