| Project Name | I120F |
| Project Name | I120F |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 213.6 | 193.9 | 180.0 | 164.6 | 164.4 | 155.7 | 122.2 | 96.4 | 90.1 | 77.3 | 75.8 | 60.0 |
| Cluster size | 296 | 217 | 243 | 221 | 189 | 173 | 126 | 157 | 91 | 112 | 105 | 70 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.23 | 3.72 | 2.22 | 3.03 | 3.14 | 3.75 | 1.70 | 2.11 | 3.96 | 3.75 | 1.48 | 3.67 |
| GDT_TS | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.82 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 1.42 | 1.40 | 1.68 | 2.90 | 1.33 | 1.38 | 3.03 | 2.01 | 1.20 | 2.89 |
| 2 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 2.93 | 3.25 | 1.54 | 2.98 | 2.49 | 1.94 | 2.93 | 3.04 | 1.70 |
| 3 | 1.42 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 1.62 | 1.77 | 3.04 | 1.05 | 0.52 | 2.84 | 2.42 | 1.33 | 3.05 |
| 4 | 1.40 | 2.93 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.09 | 3.28 | 2.04 | 1.64 | 3.04 | 1.31 | 2.09 | 3.26 |
| 5 | 1.68 | 3.25 | 1.77 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 3.58 | 2.18 | 1.89 | 3.23 | 1.47 | 2.19 | 3.55 |
| 6 | 2.90 | 1.54 | 3.04 | 3.28 | 3.58 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 2.78 | 1.40 | 3.31 | 3.22 | 0.67 |
| 7 | 1.33 | 2.98 | 1.05 | 2.04 | 2.18 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 1.11 | 3.39 | 2.87 | 0.71 | 3.30 |
| 8 | 1.38 | 2.49 | 0.52 | 1.64 | 1.89 | 2.78 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 2.36 | 1.30 | 2.74 |
| 9 | 3.03 | 1.94 | 2.84 | 3.04 | 3.23 | 1.40 | 3.39 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 3.37 | 1.33 |
| 10 | 2.01 | 2.93 | 2.42 | 1.31 | 1.47 | 3.31 | 2.87 | 2.36 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 3.31 |
| 11 | 1.20 | 3.04 | 1.33 | 2.09 | 2.19 | 3.22 | 0.71 | 1.30 | 3.37 | 2.83 | 0.00 | 3.17 |
| 12 | 2.89 | 1.70 | 3.05 | 3.26 | 3.55 | 0.67 | 3.30 | 2.74 | 1.33 | 3.31 | 3.17 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 0.70 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.86 |
| 3 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.86 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.63 |
| 5 | 0.85 | 0.60 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.59 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.98 |
| 7 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.98 | 0.66 |
| 8 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.99 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.70 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.89 |
| 10 | 0.82 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.61 |
| 11 | 0.90 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.66 | 0.98 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| 12 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.98 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.89 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013