| Project Name | isa |
| Project Name | isa |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 140.0 | 136.9 | 131.7 | 131.5 | 115.9 | 114.9 | 93.0 | 86.8 | 85.1 | 81.3 | 79.9 | 41.2 |
| Cluster size | 258 | 240 | 202 | 203 | 167 | 175 | 168 | 115 | 134 | 137 | 140 | 61 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.86 | 3.50 | 3.60 | 4.38 | 4.39 | 4.30 | 3.93 | 4.54 | 4.65 | 3.87 | 3.93 | 4.08 |
| GDT_TS | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.52 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.21 | 3.33 | 4.48 | 4.05 | 4.53 | 4.35 | 4.58 | 5.03 | 3.10 | 3.07 | 3.24 |
| 2 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 3.72 | 3.55 | 3.70 | 3.43 | 4.01 | 4.42 | 3.26 | 2.89 | 3.29 |
| 3 | 3.33 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 3.29 | 2.99 | 2.98 | 3.49 | 3.74 | 3.38 | 2.62 | 3.33 |
| 4 | 4.48 | 3.72 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 1.84 | 2.51 | 2.85 | 3.11 | 4.63 | 3.45 | 4.26 |
| 5 | 4.05 | 3.55 | 3.29 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 3.30 | 2.07 | 3.59 | 4.09 | 3.22 | 3.61 |
| 6 | 4.53 | 3.70 | 2.99 | 1.84 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 2.64 | 2.91 | 4.60 | 3.35 | 4.20 |
| 7 | 4.35 | 3.43 | 2.98 | 2.51 | 3.30 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 2.78 | 4.24 | 3.39 | 4.15 |
| 8 | 4.58 | 4.01 | 3.49 | 2.85 | 2.07 | 2.64 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 2.88 | 4.39 | 3.47 | 4.05 |
| 9 | 5.03 | 4.42 | 3.74 | 3.11 | 3.59 | 2.91 | 2.78 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 4.97 | 4.09 | 4.91 |
| 10 | 3.10 | 3.26 | 3.38 | 4.63 | 4.09 | 4.60 | 4.24 | 4.39 | 4.97 | 0.00 | 2.93 | 3.05 |
| 11 | 3.07 | 2.89 | 2.62 | 3.45 | 3.22 | 3.35 | 3.39 | 3.47 | 4.09 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 3.18 |
| 12 | 3.24 | 3.29 | 3.33 | 4.26 | 3.61 | 4.20 | 4.15 | 4.05 | 4.91 | 3.05 | 3.18 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.64 |
| 2 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.61 |
| 3 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.60 |
| 4 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.53 |
| 5 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| 6 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.52 |
| 7 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.50 |
| 8 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.57 |
| 9 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.48 |
| 10 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
| 12 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013