Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 242.6 | 174.0 | 147.1 | 131.6 | 110.6 | 101.3 | 98.9 | 92.1 | 91.8 | 89.7 | 87.8 | 62.0 |
Cluster size | 350 | 239 | 188 | 177 | 143 | 128 | 151 | 134 | 139 | 131 | 141 | 79 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.60 | 3.95 | 3.40 | 3.75 | 3.46 | 3.24 | 3.57 | 3.15 | 3.18 | 3.03 | 3.84 | 3.21 |
GDT_TS | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 1.95 | 2.74 | 2.67 | 2.29 | 3.31 | 2.89 | 2.82 | 3.24 | 3.21 | 3.19 |
2 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 3.07 | 3.11 | 2.86 | 3.57 | 2.95 | 3.12 | 3.64 | 3.42 | 3.21 |
3 | 1.95 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.73 | 2.40 | 3.11 | 3.05 | 2.95 | 3.20 | 3.44 | 2.94 |
4 | 2.74 | 3.07 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.27 | 2.54 | 3.24 | 3.32 | 2.80 | 3.60 | 2.69 |
5 | 2.67 | 3.11 | 2.73 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 2.86 | 3.20 | 3.05 | 2.94 | 3.66 | 2.78 |
6 | 2.29 | 2.86 | 2.40 | 2.27 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 3.12 | 3.14 | 2.90 | 3.52 | 2.75 |
7 | 3.31 | 3.57 | 3.11 | 2.54 | 2.86 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 3.55 | 3.39 | 2.80 | 3.95 | 2.35 |
8 | 2.89 | 2.95 | 3.05 | 3.24 | 3.20 | 3.12 | 3.55 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.82 | 2.38 | 2.96 |
9 | 2.82 | 3.12 | 2.95 | 3.32 | 3.05 | 3.14 | 3.39 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 2.76 | 2.95 |
10 | 3.24 | 3.64 | 3.20 | 2.80 | 2.94 | 2.90 | 2.80 | 2.82 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 2.38 |
11 | 3.21 | 3.42 | 3.44 | 3.60 | 3.66 | 3.52 | 3.95 | 2.38 | 2.76 | 3.33 | 0.00 | 3.47 |
12 | 3.19 | 3.21 | 2.94 | 2.69 | 2.78 | 2.75 | 2.35 | 2.96 | 2.95 | 2.38 | 3.47 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.64 |
3 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.66 |
4 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
5 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
7 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.72 |
8 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
9 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.63 |
10 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
11 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
12 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013