| Project Name | monomer |
| Project Name | monomer |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 209.1 | 164.4 | 136.3 | 133.9 | 133.2 | 131.1 | 109.2 | 107.5 | 86.7 | 60.2 | 53.4 | 40.5 |
| Cluster size | 300 | 241 | 201 | 177 | 207 | 198 | 164 | 156 | 130 | 90 | 76 | 60 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.62 | 2.17 | 2.37 | 2.58 | 2.40 | 2.32 | 2.51 | 2.63 | 2.58 | 2.65 | 2.45 | 2.63 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.01 | 1.72 | 2.23 | 2.27 | 2.06 | 2.34 | 2.46 | 2.10 | 2.23 | 2.26 | 2.31 |
| 2 | 2.01 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 1.87 | 1.79 | 1.58 | 2.21 | 2.13 | 2.05 | 2.00 | 1.93 | 2.17 |
| 3 | 1.72 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 1.92 | 2.18 | 2.12 | 1.95 | 1.93 | 2.04 | 2.17 |
| 4 | 2.23 | 1.87 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 1.79 | 1.98 | 1.92 | 1.98 | 2.24 | 2.21 | 2.22 |
| 5 | 2.27 | 1.79 | 2.15 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 2.21 | 2.24 | 2.32 | 2.14 | 2.10 | 2.30 |
| 6 | 2.06 | 1.58 | 1.92 | 1.79 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.04 | 1.89 | 2.16 |
| 7 | 2.34 | 2.21 | 2.18 | 1.98 | 2.21 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 1.66 | 2.08 | 2.28 | 2.07 | 2.11 |
| 8 | 2.46 | 2.13 | 2.12 | 1.92 | 2.24 | 2.12 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 2.33 | 2.21 | 2.12 |
| 9 | 2.10 | 2.05 | 1.95 | 1.98 | 2.32 | 2.12 | 2.08 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 1.98 | 1.40 |
| 10 | 2.23 | 2.00 | 1.93 | 2.24 | 2.14 | 2.04 | 2.28 | 2.33 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.39 |
| 11 | 2.26 | 1.93 | 2.04 | 2.21 | 2.10 | 1.89 | 2.07 | 2.21 | 1.98 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| 12 | 2.31 | 2.17 | 2.17 | 2.22 | 2.30 | 2.16 | 2.11 | 2.12 | 1.40 | 2.39 | 1.82 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| 3 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| 5 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.77 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| 9 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.86 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013