| Project Name | S374291_RFM5 |
| Project Name | S374291_RFM5 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 208.3 | 196.3 | 180.1 | 171.4 | 137.9 | 131.3 | 124.0 | 123.8 | 110.8 | 103.2 | 96.0 | 75.5 |
| Cluster size | 250 | 232 | 224 | 199 | 171 | 152 | 153 | 148 | 129 | 123 | 120 | 99 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.77 | 2.92 | 2.85 | 2.86 | 2.60 | 2.77 | 2.54 | 2.69 | 2.72 | 2.45 | 2.41 | 2.24 |
| GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 2.05 | 1.94 | 2.33 | 1.97 | 2.20 | 2.11 | 2.27 | 2.60 | 2.29 | 2.76 |
| 2 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.21 | 2.39 | 1.97 | 2.25 | 2.26 | 2.05 | 2.77 | 2.40 | 2.75 |
| 3 | 2.05 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.25 | 1.77 | 2.18 | 1.75 | 2.25 | 2.75 | 2.30 | 2.87 |
| 4 | 1.94 | 2.21 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.11 | 2.26 | 2.23 | 2.16 | 2.56 | 2.26 | 2.63 |
| 5 | 2.33 | 2.39 | 2.25 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 1.85 | 2.44 | 2.10 | 2.60 | 1.95 | 2.42 |
| 6 | 1.97 | 1.97 | 1.77 | 2.11 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 2.02 | 2.15 | 2.81 | 2.46 | 2.89 |
| 7 | 2.20 | 2.25 | 2.18 | 2.26 | 1.85 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 1.96 | 2.36 | 1.96 | 2.44 |
| 8 | 2.11 | 2.26 | 1.75 | 2.23 | 2.44 | 2.02 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.62 | 2.28 | 2.71 |
| 9 | 2.27 | 2.05 | 2.25 | 2.16 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 1.96 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 2.45 | 2.51 |
| 10 | 2.60 | 2.77 | 2.75 | 2.56 | 2.60 | 2.81 | 2.36 | 2.62 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 2.17 |
| 11 | 2.29 | 2.40 | 2.30 | 2.26 | 1.95 | 2.46 | 1.96 | 2.28 | 2.45 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 2.18 |
| 12 | 2.76 | 2.75 | 2.87 | 2.63 | 2.42 | 2.89 | 2.44 | 2.71 | 2.51 | 2.17 | 2.18 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| 4 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.71 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| 9 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013