Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 251.8 | 212.0 | 191.8 | 188.3 | 166.2 | 158.8 | 137.6 | 130.3 | 120.1 | 106.0 | 98.1 | 96.6 |
Cluster size | 280 | 224 | 201 | 209 | 179 | 168 | 146 | 134 | 148 | 112 | 102 | 97 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.27 | 3.29 | 3.02 | 3.08 | 2.95 | 2.96 | 3.14 | 3.24 | 2.98 | 2.98 | 2.82 | 2.89 |
GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 2.23 | 2.43 | 2.06 | 2.82 | 2.54 | 2.44 | 2.17 | 2.96 | 2.53 | 2.43 |
2 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 2.27 | 2.00 | 2.42 | 2.30 | 2.02 | 2.67 | 2.63 | 2.35 | 2.20 |
3 | 2.23 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 1.56 | 2.21 | 1.61 | 1.77 | 2.94 | 2.37 | 2.09 | 1.80 |
4 | 2.43 | 2.27 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 2.05 | 1.58 | 2.14 | 3.12 | 2.28 | 1.81 | 1.75 |
5 | 2.06 | 2.00 | 1.56 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 1.90 | 1.87 | 2.77 | 2.40 | 2.03 | 1.95 |
6 | 2.82 | 2.42 | 2.21 | 2.05 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.50 | 3.26 | 1.90 | 1.74 | 1.68 |
7 | 2.54 | 2.30 | 1.61 | 1.58 | 1.90 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 1.84 | 3.28 | 2.38 | 2.00 | 1.85 |
8 | 2.44 | 2.02 | 1.77 | 2.14 | 1.87 | 2.50 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 2.69 | 2.23 | 2.18 |
9 | 2.17 | 2.67 | 2.94 | 3.12 | 2.77 | 3.26 | 3.28 | 3.13 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 3.05 | 3.04 |
10 | 2.96 | 2.63 | 2.37 | 2.28 | 2.40 | 1.90 | 2.38 | 2.69 | 3.33 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 1.85 |
11 | 2.53 | 2.35 | 2.09 | 1.81 | 2.03 | 1.74 | 2.00 | 2.23 | 3.05 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
12 | 2.43 | 2.20 | 1.80 | 1.75 | 1.95 | 1.68 | 1.85 | 2.18 | 3.04 | 1.85 | 1.82 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
3 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
4 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
5 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
6 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.82 |
7 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
8 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
9 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
10 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
11 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
12 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013