| Project Name | MKMUT61 |
| Project Name | MKMUT61 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 104.2 | 103.3 | 84.3 | 68.0 | 63.8 | 56.8 | 54.3 | 52.8 | 51.1 | 41.8 | 39.9 | 18.0 |
| Cluster size | 267 | 288 | 168 | 153 | 174 | 177 | 149 | 117 | 182 | 147 | 111 | 67 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.49 | 4.36 | 7.89 | 6.48 | 6.81 | 5.05 | 4.52 | 7.37 | 5.10 | 6.41 | 4.53 | 7.45 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.79 | 5.78 | 5.01 | 5.41 | 3.14 | 2.60 | 6.67 | 3.48 | 4.91 | 2.73 | 6.74 |
| 2 | 2.79 | 0.00 | 5.48 | 4.12 | 4.44 | 2.45 | 2.78 | 6.05 | 3.57 | 4.81 | 0.91 | 6.22 |
| 3 | 5.78 | 5.48 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 1.91 | 5.70 | 6.08 | 4.19 | 5.25 | 5.52 | 5.50 | 4.88 |
| 4 | 5.01 | 4.12 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 1.46 | 4.66 | 4.89 | 4.22 | 4.56 | 5.12 | 4.25 | 4.74 |
| 5 | 5.41 | 4.44 | 1.91 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 4.87 | 5.33 | 4.16 | 4.67 | 5.01 | 4.58 | 4.85 |
| 6 | 3.14 | 2.45 | 5.70 | 4.66 | 4.87 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 5.41 | 3.27 | 4.51 | 2.64 | 5.80 |
| 7 | 2.60 | 2.78 | 6.08 | 4.89 | 5.33 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 6.34 | 2.79 | 4.38 | 3.02 | 6.39 |
| 8 | 6.67 | 6.05 | 4.19 | 4.22 | 4.16 | 5.41 | 6.34 | 0.00 | 5.91 | 6.12 | 6.25 | 2.58 |
| 9 | 3.48 | 3.57 | 5.25 | 4.56 | 4.67 | 3.27 | 2.79 | 5.91 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 3.74 | 6.12 |
| 10 | 4.91 | 4.81 | 5.52 | 5.12 | 5.01 | 4.51 | 4.38 | 6.12 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 5.06 | 5.61 |
| 11 | 2.73 | 0.91 | 5.50 | 4.25 | 4.58 | 2.64 | 3.02 | 6.25 | 3.74 | 5.06 | 0.00 | 6.50 |
| 12 | 6.74 | 6.22 | 4.88 | 4.74 | 4.85 | 5.80 | 6.39 | 2.58 | 6.12 | 5.61 | 6.50 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.56 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.90 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.96 | 0.59 |
| 3 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.76 |
| 4 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.77 |
| 5 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.70 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.90 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.56 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 0.70 | 0.57 |
| 8 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.85 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.93 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.61 |
| 10 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.58 |
| 11 | 0.77 | 0.96 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| 12 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013