| Project Name | TRadDuiA |
| Project Name | TRadDuiA |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 201.1 | 164.9 | 155.3 | 150.6 | 133.7 | 124.7 | 122.4 | 118.8 | 106.5 | 88.8 | 86.3 | 46.9 |
| Cluster size | 270 | 212 | 209 | 202 | 176 | 170 | 167 | 152 | 146 | 132 | 107 | 57 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.59 | 4.00 | 3.98 | 4.00 | 4.19 | 3.71 | 3.60 | 4.05 | 3.58 | 3.15 | 3.92 | 3.93 |
| GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 1.88 | 2.47 | 2.51 | 2.44 | 2.16 | 2.37 | 1.95 | 2.86 | 2.01 | 2.15 |
| 2 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 2.41 | 2.15 | 1.99 | 2.33 | 2.26 | 2.88 | 3.03 | 2.23 | 2.75 |
| 3 | 1.88 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 2.34 | 2.49 | 2.18 | 2.30 | 2.35 | 3.20 | 2.03 | 2.13 |
| 4 | 2.47 | 2.41 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.66 | 2.00 | 2.29 | 2.58 | 3.37 | 2.29 | 2.49 |
| 5 | 2.51 | 2.15 | 2.34 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 2.29 | 2.09 | 2.78 | 3.35 | 2.08 | 2.76 |
| 6 | 2.44 | 1.99 | 2.49 | 2.66 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 2.28 | 2.68 | 2.69 | 2.16 | 2.49 |
| 7 | 2.16 | 2.33 | 2.18 | 2.00 | 2.29 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.25 | 3.06 | 2.09 | 2.27 |
| 8 | 2.37 | 2.26 | 2.30 | 2.29 | 2.09 | 2.28 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 3.24 | 1.98 | 2.54 |
| 9 | 1.95 | 2.88 | 2.35 | 2.58 | 2.78 | 2.68 | 2.25 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 2.96 | 2.22 | 1.98 |
| 10 | 2.86 | 3.03 | 3.20 | 3.37 | 3.35 | 2.69 | 3.06 | 3.24 | 2.96 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 2.94 |
| 11 | 2.01 | 2.23 | 2.03 | 2.29 | 2.08 | 2.16 | 2.09 | 1.98 | 2.22 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 2.13 |
| 12 | 2.15 | 2.75 | 2.13 | 2.49 | 2.76 | 2.49 | 2.27 | 2.54 | 1.98 | 2.94 | 2.13 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.71 |
| 6 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| 9 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.81 |
| 10 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| 12 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013