| Project Name | v3wt |
| Project Name | v3wt |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 187.6 | 183.7 | 171.6 | 164.5 | 139.6 | 125.2 | 115.8 | 115.7 | 112.6 | 106.4 | 82.8 | 75.4 |
| Cluster size | 243 | 214 | 249 | 217 | 184 | 160 | 134 | 148 | 138 | 129 | 105 | 79 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.85 | 2.76 | 3.05 | 2.80 | 2.93 | 2.80 | 2.71 | 2.64 | 2.71 | 3.11 | 2.83 | 3.23 |
| GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.62 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.74 | 2.09 | 2.60 | 2.40 | 2.28 | 2.72 | 2.17 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.51 |
| 2 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.12 | 2.10 | 2.34 | 2.09 | 2.34 | 2.21 | 2.72 | 2.53 | 2.19 |
| 3 | 2.74 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 2.82 | 2.57 | 2.54 | 2.65 | 3.02 | 2.36 | 2.34 | 2.87 | 2.72 |
| 4 | 2.09 | 2.12 | 2.82 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.47 | 2.42 | 2.21 | 2.05 | 3.15 | 2.70 | 2.26 |
| 5 | 2.60 | 2.10 | 2.57 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 2.50 | 2.74 | 2.44 | 3.24 | 2.90 | 2.20 |
| 6 | 2.40 | 2.34 | 2.54 | 2.47 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.47 | 2.28 | 2.43 | 2.75 | 3.03 |
| 7 | 2.28 | 2.09 | 2.65 | 2.42 | 2.50 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 2.62 | 2.70 | 2.61 | 2.74 |
| 8 | 2.72 | 2.34 | 3.02 | 2.21 | 2.74 | 2.47 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 3.07 | 2.22 | 3.05 |
| 9 | 2.17 | 2.21 | 2.36 | 2.05 | 2.44 | 2.28 | 2.62 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 2.62 | 2.48 |
| 10 | 3.00 | 2.72 | 2.34 | 3.15 | 3.24 | 2.43 | 2.70 | 3.07 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 3.25 |
| 11 | 3.00 | 2.53 | 2.87 | 2.70 | 2.90 | 2.75 | 2.61 | 2.22 | 2.62 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.87 |
| 12 | 2.51 | 2.19 | 2.72 | 2.26 | 2.20 | 3.03 | 2.74 | 3.05 | 2.48 | 3.25 | 2.87 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.73 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.64 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.62 |
| 9 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| 10 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| 12 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013