| Project Name | GS56 |
| Project Name | GS56 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 134.8 | 92.6 | 72.9 | 66.1 | 62.1 | 61.4 | 58.2 | 51.4 | 47.0 | 35.4 | 34.6 | 28.5 |
| Cluster size | 276 | 253 | 229 | 177 | 117 | 171 | 182 | 166 | 92 | 105 | 132 | 100 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 3.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.10 | 4.46 | 5.06 | 3.71 | 3.12 | 6.05 | 6.05 | 4.88 | 6.99 | 4.44 | 5.61 | 6.41 |
| GDT_TS | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.62 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 3.98 | 2.10 | 4.27 | 4.09 | 4.86 | 3.65 | 6.04 | 4.24 | 4.46 | 5.24 |
| 2 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 3.49 | 2.48 | 4.48 | 3.79 | 4.68 | 3.51 | 5.67 | 3.72 | 3.72 | 4.87 |
| 3 | 3.98 | 3.49 | 0.00 | 3.51 | 5.18 | 5.04 | 4.43 | 2.10 | 4.44 | 3.48 | 2.50 | 4.76 |
| 4 | 2.10 | 2.48 | 3.51 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 4.53 | 4.49 | 3.43 | 5.47 | 3.81 | 4.55 | 5.20 |
| 5 | 4.27 | 4.48 | 5.18 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5.89 | 5.60 | 5.22 | 6.36 | 3.68 | 5.59 | 6.12 |
| 6 | 4.09 | 3.79 | 5.04 | 4.53 | 5.89 | 0.00 | 5.20 | 4.26 | 4.67 | 5.93 | 4.86 | 5.41 |
| 7 | 4.86 | 4.68 | 4.43 | 4.49 | 5.60 | 5.20 | 0.00 | 4.75 | 4.60 | 4.68 | 5.32 | 2.35 |
| 8 | 3.65 | 3.51 | 2.10 | 3.43 | 5.22 | 4.26 | 4.75 | 0.00 | 4.42 | 4.06 | 2.73 | 5.02 |
| 9 | 6.04 | 5.67 | 4.44 | 5.47 | 6.36 | 4.67 | 4.60 | 4.42 | 0.00 | 5.29 | 5.23 | 5.49 |
| 10 | 4.24 | 3.72 | 3.48 | 3.81 | 3.68 | 5.93 | 4.68 | 4.06 | 5.29 | 0.00 | 4.18 | 5.22 |
| 11 | 4.46 | 3.72 | 2.50 | 4.55 | 5.59 | 4.86 | 5.32 | 2.73 | 5.23 | 4.18 | 0.00 | 4.91 |
| 12 | 5.24 | 4.87 | 4.76 | 5.20 | 6.12 | 5.41 | 2.35 | 5.02 | 5.49 | 5.22 | 4.91 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.49 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.84 |
| 5 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.60 |
| 6 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.63 |
| 7 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.84 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.66 | 0.49 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.65 |
| 9 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.55 |
| 10 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| 11 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.47 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013