| Project Name | 22LFminimized |
| Project Name | 22LFminimized |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 415.6 | 398.2 | 366.7 | 331.9 | 259.7 | 242.1 | 227.9 | 224.5 | 159.2 | 74.0 | 51.5 | 50.8 |
| Cluster size | 294 | 257 | 260 | 220 | 188 | 153 | 170 | 187 | 118 | 62 | 43 | 48 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.48 | 1.36 | 1.46 | 1.43 | 1.64 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.47 | 2.34 | 2.14 | 2.37 | 2.01 |
| GDT_TS | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.88 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.45 | 1.67 | 1.70 | 1.95 | 1.64 |
| 2 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.36 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 1.61 | 1.75 | 1.85 | 1.67 |
| 3 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.66 | 0.53 | 1.64 | 1.68 | 1.81 | 1.68 |
| 4 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.54 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 1.73 | 1.72 | 1.86 | 1.65 |
| 5 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 1.09 | 0.91 | 1.67 | 1.74 | 1.83 | 1.95 |
| 6 | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 1.64 | 1.74 | 1.82 | 1.75 |
| 7 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 1.09 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 1.88 | 1.68 | 2.02 | 1.45 |
| 8 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 1.68 | 1.99 | 1.57 |
| 9 | 1.67 | 1.61 | 1.64 | 1.73 | 1.67 | 1.64 | 1.88 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 2.14 | 2.46 |
| 10 | 1.70 | 1.75 | 1.68 | 1.72 | 1.74 | 1.74 | 1.68 | 1.68 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 1.28 | 2.24 |
| 11 | 1.95 | 1.85 | 1.81 | 1.86 | 1.83 | 1.82 | 2.02 | 1.99 | 2.14 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 2.63 |
| 12 | 1.64 | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.65 | 1.95 | 1.75 | 1.45 | 1.57 | 2.46 | 2.24 | 2.63 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.97 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.96 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.94 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| 5 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.92 |
| 6 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.96 |
| 7 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.97 |
| 8 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.97 |
| 9 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.91 |
| 10 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.88 |
| 11 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.84 |
| 12 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013