| Project Name | EM86_Lambertson |
| Project Name | EM86_Lambertson |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 113.3 | 108.0 | 100.5 | 89.5 | 77.0 | 66.9 | 52.8 | 48.3 | 41.2 | 37.7 | 32.5 | 16.1 |
| Cluster size | 313 | 207 | 219 | 251 | 234 | 211 | 151 | 133 | 64 | 93 | 88 | 36 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.8 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.82 | 5.93 | 4.74 | 3.72 | 4.75 | 5.40 | 6.19 | 6.93 | 6.43 | 3.45 | 7.10 | 7.11 |
| GDT_TS | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.13 | 3.24 | 1.89 | 3.10 | 3.27 | 4.34 | 4.81 | 2.96 | 3.26 | 4.88 | 5.75 |
| 2 | 4.13 | 0.00 | 4.05 | 4.42 | 5.02 | 3.31 | 4.76 | 5.19 | 4.84 | 4.99 | 3.38 | 7.66 |
| 3 | 3.24 | 4.05 | 0.00 | 3.31 | 2.35 | 2.92 | 3.87 | 4.60 | 5.52 | 2.59 | 5.10 | 6.09 |
| 4 | 1.89 | 4.42 | 3.31 | 0.00 | 3.45 | 3.91 | 5.23 | 5.58 | 3.94 | 2.69 | 5.54 | 6.47 |
| 5 | 3.10 | 5.02 | 2.35 | 3.45 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 3.30 | 3.96 | 5.03 | 3.00 | 5.08 | 5.04 |
| 6 | 3.27 | 3.31 | 2.92 | 3.91 | 3.41 | 0.00 | 3.06 | 3.62 | 4.60 | 4.28 | 4.40 | 5.76 |
| 7 | 4.34 | 4.76 | 3.87 | 5.23 | 3.30 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 5.19 | 5.41 | 4.17 | 4.27 |
| 8 | 4.81 | 5.19 | 4.60 | 5.58 | 3.96 | 3.62 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 5.57 | 5.86 | 4.08 | 4.01 |
| 9 | 2.96 | 4.84 | 5.52 | 3.94 | 5.03 | 4.60 | 5.19 | 5.57 | 0.00 | 5.81 | 5.50 | 6.18 |
| 10 | 3.26 | 4.99 | 2.59 | 2.69 | 3.00 | 4.28 | 5.41 | 5.86 | 5.81 | 0.00 | 5.84 | 6.82 |
| 11 | 4.88 | 3.38 | 5.10 | 5.54 | 5.08 | 4.40 | 4.17 | 4.08 | 5.50 | 5.84 | 0.00 | 6.62 |
| 12 | 5.75 | 7.66 | 6.09 | 6.47 | 5.04 | 5.76 | 4.27 | 4.01 | 6.18 | 6.82 | 6.62 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.74 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.55 | 0.64 |
| 2 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.54 |
| 3 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.72 |
| 4 | 0.86 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.51 | 0.63 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.65 |
| 7 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.69 |
| 8 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.66 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.79 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| 12 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013