| Project Name | 42M |
| Project Name | 42M |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 511.2 | 465.9 | 448.7 | 211.2 | 158.9 | 152.4 | 108.2 | 69.8 | 53.6 | 34.4 | 28.2 | 16.5 |
| Cluster size | 388 | 354 | 399 | 191 | 164 | 165 | 100 | 56 | 57 | 68 | 39 | 19 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.69 | 1.64 | 2.05 | 1.86 | 2.08 | 1.97 | 5.25 | 2.48 | 1.64 | 2.62 | 4.41 | 4.49 |
| GDT_TS | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 4.11 | 1.67 | 1.03 | 2.40 | 3.36 | 3.44 |
| 2 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 4.23 | 1.65 | 0.92 | 2.25 | 3.48 | 3.59 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 4.07 | 1.64 | 0.97 | 2.37 | 3.51 | 3.58 |
| 4 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 1.01 | 4.22 | 1.65 | 0.87 | 2.45 | 3.68 | 3.69 |
| 5 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 3.93 | 1.72 | 1.30 | 2.53 | 3.26 | 3.48 |
| 6 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 4.06 | 1.45 | 1.06 | 2.18 | 3.30 | 3.41 |
| 7 | 4.11 | 4.23 | 4.07 | 4.22 | 3.93 | 4.06 | 0.00 | 4.39 | 4.70 | 4.47 | 1.42 | 2.00 |
| 8 | 1.67 | 1.65 | 1.64 | 1.65 | 1.72 | 1.45 | 4.39 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 2.68 | 3.79 | 3.89 |
| 9 | 1.03 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.87 | 1.30 | 1.06 | 4.70 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 4.00 | 3.99 |
| 10 | 2.40 | 2.25 | 2.37 | 2.45 | 2.53 | 2.18 | 4.47 | 2.68 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 3.60 | 3.96 |
| 11 | 3.36 | 3.48 | 3.51 | 3.68 | 3.26 | 3.30 | 1.42 | 3.79 | 4.00 | 3.60 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| 12 | 3.44 | 3.59 | 3.58 | 3.69 | 3.48 | 3.41 | 2.00 | 3.89 | 3.99 | 3.96 | 1.82 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.84 |
| 3 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| 4 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| 5 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.84 |
| 6 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| 7 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.90 |
| 8 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| 9 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.78 |
| 10 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.80 |
| 11 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.89 |
| 12 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013