| Project Name | E.G. |
| Project Name | E.G. |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 112.6 | 101.3 | 58.4 | 56.1 | 52.1 | 48.9 | 48.3 | 47.3 | 45.0 | 43.2 | 42.0 | 34.3 |
| Cluster size | 294 | 218 | 182 | 188 | 164 | 146 | 151 | 145 | 146 | 119 | 139 | 108 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.6 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.39 | 4.33 | 5.66 | 4.86 | 5.51 | 4.39 | 4.57 | 6.11 | 5.18 | 3.90 | 5.37 | 6.92 |
| GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.55 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 4.97 | 3.76 | 4.84 | 2.02 | 3.45 | 5.92 | 3.60 | 2.29 | 4.68 | 6.43 |
| 2 | 2.83 | 0.00 | 3.83 | 3.12 | 4.61 | 2.03 | 3.11 | 4.73 | 4.22 | 2.22 | 4.22 | 5.91 |
| 3 | 4.97 | 3.83 | 0.00 | 4.07 | 3.97 | 4.71 | 3.83 | 4.18 | 4.81 | 4.54 | 3.46 | 5.14 |
| 4 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 3.20 | 2.46 | 3.75 | 3.22 | 3.59 | 3.56 | 4.46 |
| 5 | 4.84 | 4.61 | 3.97 | 3.47 | 0.00 | 4.95 | 3.51 | 3.36 | 3.46 | 4.68 | 2.12 | 3.64 |
| 6 | 2.02 | 2.03 | 4.71 | 3.20 | 4.95 | 0.00 | 3.32 | 5.28 | 3.89 | 1.79 | 4.66 | 5.95 |
| 7 | 3.45 | 3.11 | 3.83 | 2.46 | 3.51 | 3.32 | 0.00 | 5.15 | 2.32 | 3.33 | 3.41 | 5.70 |
| 8 | 5.92 | 4.73 | 4.18 | 3.75 | 3.36 | 5.28 | 5.15 | 0.00 | 5.28 | 5.40 | 3.51 | 2.36 |
| 9 | 3.60 | 4.22 | 4.81 | 3.22 | 3.46 | 3.89 | 2.32 | 5.28 | 0.00 | 4.18 | 3.12 | 5.32 |
| 10 | 2.29 | 2.22 | 4.54 | 3.59 | 4.68 | 1.79 | 3.33 | 5.40 | 4.18 | 0.00 | 4.58 | 6.18 |
| 11 | 4.68 | 4.22 | 3.46 | 3.56 | 2.12 | 4.66 | 3.41 | 3.51 | 3.12 | 4.58 | 0.00 | 3.69 |
| 12 | 6.43 | 5.91 | 5.14 | 4.46 | 3.64 | 5.95 | 5.70 | 2.36 | 5.32 | 6.18 | 3.69 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.64 |
| 2 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
| 4 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.75 |
| 6 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.91 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
| 7 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| 9 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| 10 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.91 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
| 11 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.82 |
| 12 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013