| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 83.6 | 72.4 | 72.3 | 60.2 | 56.8 | 53.3 | 51.3 | 47.2 | 43.8 | 36.7 | 35.6 | 33.2 |
| Cluster size | 233 | 208 | 219 | 189 | 185 | 190 | 188 | 142 | 142 | 108 | 109 | 87 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.8 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 12.60 | 12.10 | 13.00 | 11.50 | 12.90 | 11.50 | 12.50 | 12.10 | 9.19 | 11.70 | 10.10 | 10.10 |
| GDT_TS | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 6.46 | 7.17 | 6.79 | 6.66 | 7.65 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 7.66 | 6.75 | 8.81 | 8.04 |
| 2 | 6.46 | 0.00 | 3.88 | 5.00 | 6.24 | 7.79 | 6.96 | 6.00 | 9.90 | 5.08 | 10.00 | 10.40 |
| 3 | 7.17 | 3.88 | 0.00 | 6.47 | 7.17 | 9.27 | 8.40 | 6.94 | 11.00 | 4.71 | 11.50 | 11.80 |
| 4 | 6.79 | 5.00 | 6.47 | 0.00 | 5.28 | 6.22 | 5.45 | 5.33 | 8.65 | 6.21 | 8.62 | 9.15 |
| 5 | 6.66 | 6.24 | 7.17 | 5.28 | 0.00 | 5.62 | 4.36 | 5.76 | 8.98 | 6.96 | 9.03 | 9.42 |
| 6 | 7.65 | 7.79 | 9.27 | 6.22 | 5.62 | 0.00 | 5.33 | 7.28 | 7.59 | 9.03 | 7.38 | 7.82 |
| 7 | 6.50 | 6.96 | 8.40 | 5.45 | 4.36 | 5.33 | 0.00 | 5.83 | 7.81 | 7.64 | 7.92 | 7.95 |
| 8 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 6.94 | 5.33 | 5.76 | 7.28 | 5.83 | 0.00 | 8.22 | 6.27 | 8.94 | 8.86 |
| 9 | 7.66 | 9.90 | 11.00 | 8.65 | 8.98 | 7.59 | 7.81 | 8.22 | 0.00 | 9.36 | 4.93 | 4.39 |
| 10 | 6.75 | 5.08 | 4.71 | 6.21 | 6.96 | 9.03 | 7.64 | 6.27 | 9.36 | 0.00 | 9.94 | 10.20 |
| 11 | 8.81 | 10.00 | 11.50 | 8.62 | 9.03 | 7.38 | 7.92 | 8.94 | 4.93 | 9.94 | 0.00 | 4.43 |
| 12 | 8.04 | 10.40 | 11.80 | 9.15 | 9.42 | 7.82 | 7.95 | 8.86 | 4.39 | 10.20 | 4.43 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.37 |
| 2 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.53 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| 3 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.25 | 0.53 | 0.27 | 0.26 |
| 4 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| 5 | 0.50 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.37 |
| 6 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| 7 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.38 |
| 8 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| 9 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 1.00 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.52 |
| 10 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| 11 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.27 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
| 12 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.27 | 0.56 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013