| Project Name | 3 |
| Project Name | 3 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 167.4 | 153.5 | 151.8 | 149.7 | 147.1 | 128.6 | 113.2 | 110.8 | 108.3 | 95.4 | 94.9 | 76.7 |
| Cluster size | 229 | 203 | 185 | 201 | 179 | 195 | 141 | 155 | 136 | 139 | 134 | 103 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.27 | 3.16 | 3.31 | 2.96 | 3.21 | 3.05 | 3.38 | 2.94 | 3.16 | 2.92 | 3.15 | 2.71 |
| GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 2.04 | 2.18 | 2.20 | 2.42 | 2.22 | 1.83 | 2.54 | 2.26 | 2.27 | 2.28 |
| 2 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.09 | 2.25 | 2.19 | 2.40 | 1.89 | 2.38 | 2.20 | 2.21 | 2.17 |
| 3 | 2.04 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 1.93 | 2.76 | 2.36 | 2.40 | 3.03 | 2.71 | 2.23 | 2.72 |
| 4 | 2.18 | 2.09 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 2.05 | 2.20 | 2.09 | 2.28 | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.23 |
| 5 | 2.20 | 2.25 | 1.93 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 2.54 | 2.35 | 3.12 | 2.67 | 2.35 | 2.89 |
| 6 | 2.42 | 2.19 | 2.76 | 2.05 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.18 | 2.19 | 2.34 | 2.37 | 2.06 |
| 7 | 2.22 | 2.40 | 2.36 | 2.20 | 2.54 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.55 | 2.58 | 2.12 | 2.69 |
| 8 | 1.83 | 1.89 | 2.40 | 2.09 | 2.35 | 2.18 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.14 | 2.28 | 2.01 |
| 9 | 2.54 | 2.38 | 3.03 | 2.28 | 3.12 | 2.19 | 2.55 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.77 | 2.18 |
| 10 | 2.26 | 2.20 | 2.71 | 2.29 | 2.67 | 2.34 | 2.58 | 2.14 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 2.24 |
| 11 | 2.27 | 2.21 | 2.23 | 2.29 | 2.35 | 2.37 | 2.12 | 2.28 | 2.77 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 2.71 |
| 12 | 2.28 | 2.17 | 2.72 | 2.23 | 2.89 | 2.06 | 2.69 | 2.01 | 2.18 | 2.24 | 2.71 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| 2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.68 |
| 4 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.79 |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| 8 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| 12 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013