| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 389.4 | 265.1 | 263.5 | 201.7 | 195.9 | 179.9 | 157.5 | 154.5 | 130.5 | 125.0 | 112.3 | 103.3 |
| Cluster size | 345 | 243 | 225 | 182 | 188 | 150 | 122 | 126 | 102 | 118 | 98 | 101 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.39 | 2.20 | 2.74 | 2.38 | 2.02 | 2.55 | 2.34 | 2.56 | 2.92 | 2.25 | 2.22 | 2.00 |
| GDT_TS | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.74 | 2.13 | 1.57 | 1.79 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.77 | 2.20 | 1.34 | 1.44 | 1.80 |
| 2 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 1.60 | 1.73 | 2.03 | 1.96 | 1.93 | 2.28 | 1.54 | 1.65 | 1.47 |
| 3 | 2.13 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 1.84 | 2.20 | 1.45 | 1.30 | 1.53 | 1.22 | 2.05 | 1.97 | 2.41 |
| 4 | 1.57 | 1.60 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 1.73 | 1.63 | 1.53 | 1.80 | 1.54 | 1.35 | 2.01 |
| 5 | 1.79 | 1.73 | 2.20 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.82 | 1.86 | 1.91 | 2.17 | 1.66 | 1.75 | 1.65 |
| 6 | 1.94 | 2.03 | 1.45 | 1.73 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 1.26 | 1.16 | 1.36 | 1.85 | 1.67 | 2.12 |
| 7 | 1.94 | 1.96 | 1.30 | 1.63 | 1.86 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.36 | 1.38 | 1.76 | 1.53 | 2.04 |
| 8 | 1.77 | 1.93 | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.91 | 1.16 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.38 | 1.70 | 1.46 | 2.12 |
| 9 | 2.20 | 2.28 | 1.22 | 1.80 | 2.17 | 1.36 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 1.98 | 2.48 |
| 10 | 1.34 | 1.54 | 2.05 | 1.54 | 1.66 | 1.85 | 1.76 | 1.70 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 1.47 |
| 11 | 1.44 | 1.65 | 1.97 | 1.35 | 1.75 | 1.67 | 1.53 | 1.46 | 1.98 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
| 12 | 1.80 | 1.47 | 2.41 | 2.01 | 1.65 | 2.12 | 2.04 | 2.12 | 2.48 | 1.47 | 1.86 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.78 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.83 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.76 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.83 |
| 11 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013