| Project Name | b |
| Project Name | b |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 100.2 | 94.8 | 91.7 | 87.7 | 85.8 | 81.8 | 81.3 | 80.4 | 75.8 | 56.7 | 52.9 | 48.7 |
| Cluster size | 216 | 215 | 194 | 210 | 205 | 180 | 159 | 188 | 133 | 99 | 91 | 110 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.28 | 3.37 | 3.36 | 3.96 | 3.92 | 3.77 | 3.16 | 3.62 | 4.17 | 3.94 | 3.66 | 3.95 |
| GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 2.94 | 3.42 | 2.83 | 2.99 | 2.83 | 3.17 | 3.18 | 3.06 | 3.31 | 3.39 |
| 2 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 3.81 | 3.71 | 3.33 | 2.47 | 3.43 | 3.76 | 3.87 | 2.57 | 3.01 |
| 3 | 2.94 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 3.52 | 3.27 | 3.47 | 2.16 | 2.82 | 3.02 | 3.43 | 2.97 | 3.35 |
| 4 | 3.42 | 3.81 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 3.09 | 2.74 | 3.81 | 2.88 | 3.14 | 4.05 | 3.47 | 4.14 |
| 5 | 2.83 | 3.71 | 3.27 | 3.09 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 3.69 | 3.54 | 2.75 | 3.02 | 3.43 | 3.82 |
| 6 | 2.99 | 3.33 | 3.47 | 2.74 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 3.59 | 3.34 | 2.95 | 3.54 | 2.99 | 3.84 |
| 7 | 2.83 | 2.47 | 2.16 | 3.81 | 3.69 | 3.59 | 0.00 | 3.05 | 3.16 | 3.34 | 2.97 | 3.40 |
| 8 | 3.17 | 3.43 | 2.82 | 2.88 | 3.54 | 3.34 | 3.05 | 0.00 | 3.37 | 4.32 | 3.62 | 3.85 |
| 9 | 3.18 | 3.76 | 3.02 | 3.14 | 2.75 | 2.95 | 3.16 | 3.37 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 3.32 | 3.98 |
| 10 | 3.06 | 3.87 | 3.43 | 4.05 | 3.02 | 3.54 | 3.34 | 4.32 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 3.68 | 4.20 |
| 11 | 3.31 | 2.57 | 2.97 | 3.47 | 3.43 | 2.99 | 2.97 | 3.62 | 3.32 | 3.68 | 0.00 | 3.57 |
| 12 | 3.39 | 3.01 | 3.35 | 4.14 | 3.82 | 3.84 | 3.40 | 3.85 | 3.98 | 4.20 | 3.57 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| 2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| 6 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 9 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| 11 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013