| Project Name | Mutation3BoundNK |
| Project Name | Mutation3BoundNK |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 114.8 | 103.3 | 75.9 | 68.8 | 67.1 | 52.2 | 46.2 | 36.8 | 30.1 | 26.1 | 23.7 | 17.7 |
| Cluster size | 307 | 309 | 205 | 209 | 226 | 154 | 154 | 119 | 98 | 82 | 81 | 56 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.13 | 3.35 | 4.14 | 4.53 | 3.36 | 3.38 | 4.10 | 5.53 | 6.28 | 6.08 | 5.63 | 6.98 |
| GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.59 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.85 | 3.25 | 3.43 | 2.20 | 1.96 | 3.21 | 4.97 | 5.76 | 5.90 | 5.22 | 6.14 |
| 2 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.83 | 1.84 | 1.49 | 2.48 | 4.45 | 5.30 | 5.35 | 4.24 | 5.87 |
| 3 | 3.25 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 3.12 | 2.90 | 2.94 | 3.55 | 4.33 | 4.57 | 4.25 | 5.15 |
| 4 | 3.43 | 2.83 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 3.43 | 3.34 | 3.47 | 4.08 | 4.26 | 4.30 | 4.59 |
| 5 | 2.20 | 1.84 | 3.12 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 4.58 | 5.40 | 5.24 | 3.95 | 5.58 |
| 6 | 1.96 | 1.49 | 2.90 | 3.43 | 2.41 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 4.97 | 6.07 | 6.22 | 5.02 | 6.65 |
| 7 | 3.21 | 2.48 | 2.94 | 3.34 | 2.66 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 4.88 | 5.42 | 5.05 | 3.39 | 5.14 |
| 8 | 4.97 | 4.45 | 3.55 | 3.47 | 4.58 | 4.97 | 4.88 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 2.84 | 3.97 | 3.79 |
| 9 | 5.76 | 5.30 | 4.33 | 4.08 | 5.40 | 6.07 | 5.42 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 4.44 | 3.00 |
| 10 | 5.90 | 5.35 | 4.57 | 4.26 | 5.24 | 6.22 | 5.05 | 2.84 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 4.02 | 2.75 |
| 11 | 5.22 | 4.24 | 4.25 | 4.30 | 3.95 | 5.02 | 3.39 | 3.97 | 4.44 | 4.02 | 0.00 | 3.99 |
| 12 | 6.14 | 5.87 | 5.15 | 4.59 | 5.58 | 6.65 | 5.14 | 3.79 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 3.99 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.61 |
| 2 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.56 |
| 3 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.73 | 0.57 |
| 4 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.59 |
| 5 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| 6 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.56 |
| 7 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.54 |
| 8 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 10 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.72 |
| 11 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013