| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| Cluster density | 227.8 | 221.2 | 207.3 | 201.1 | 190.1 | 173.8 | 70.8 | 59.6 | 43.5 | 13.9 |
| Cluster size | 304 | 320 | 270 | 284 | 286 | 258 | 100 | 77 | 76 | 25 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| RMSD | 6.03 | 6.61 | 7.23 | 6.39 | 6.01 | 9.74 | 6.11 | 4.79 | 11.30 | 4.48 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.61 | 2.23 | 2.47 | 8.21 | 3.36 | 3.16 | 11.50 | 4.14 |
| 2 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.31 | 2.30 | 8.22 | 3.26 | 3.54 | 11.20 | 4.55 |
| 3 | 2.61 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.72 | 3.19 | 8.20 | 4.00 | 3.97 | 11.70 | 4.86 |
| 4 | 2.23 | 2.31 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 8.48 | 3.39 | 3.85 | 11.10 | 4.75 |
| 5 | 2.47 | 2.30 | 3.19 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 8.25 | 2.85 | 3.00 | 11.30 | 4.25 |
| 6 | 8.21 | 8.22 | 8.20 | 8.48 | 8.25 | 0.00 | 8.36 | 8.38 | 13.30 | 8.83 |
| 7 | 3.36 | 3.26 | 4.00 | 3.39 | 2.85 | 8.36 | 0.00 | 3.42 | 11.00 | 4.62 |
| 8 | 3.16 | 3.54 | 3.97 | 3.85 | 3.00 | 8.38 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 11.20 | 2.61 |
| 9 | 11.50 | 11.20 | 11.70 | 11.10 | 11.30 | 13.30 | 11.00 | 11.20 | 0.00 | 11.40 |
| 10 | 4.14 | 4.55 | 4.86 | 4.75 | 4.25 | 8.83 | 4.62 | 2.61 | 11.40 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 0.56 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.56 | 0.66 |
| 8 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.78 |
| 9 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013